The Church and the Funerary Landscape

K. Mees
{"title":"The Church and the Funerary Landscape","authors":"K. Mees","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvd58stg.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the words of Alan Everitt, ‘the church has had a greater impact on the landscape and economy … than any other human agency.’ Granted, Everitt was referring specifically in this case to Kent, which was of course subject to a set of circumstances that were in many ways distinct from those experienced by other areas of southern England. Still, the transformations wrought by the ascendancy of Christianity can be as keenly recognised in Wessex as elsewhere. Any radical change to a dominant religious or political order can provoke or expedite tangible changes in how the landscape is structured and exploited – within, of course, the constraints of the physical environment: geology, soils, topography and climate. What was uniquely transformative about the influence of the Roman Church in the Middle Anglo-Saxon period was its capacity to allow elites to consolidate their power – owing in part to its innately hierarchical structure – and thus to effect change in the landscape. The Church as an institution was responsible for profound alterations in the nature of landholding. The stability afforded by perpetual ownership provided an incentive for royal powers to invest in the land and to improve productivity. Furthermore, the generation of agricultural surpluses through increasingly specialised means of production was essential for supporting the new array of ecclesiastical communities and monastic houses, which were occupied on a permanent basis, in contrast to the predominantly peripatetic royal entourages. Of course, it would be unwise to exaggerate the role of the Church as a driver of landscape change, and we must be careful not to overplay the top-down influence of elite engagement with this ascendant ideology. The fact that the vast majority of the surviving written sources for the Middle Anglo-Saxon period relate to the lands held by major minsters creates a degree of bias, in that ecclesiastical land organisation is unavoidably presented as typical. It is nevertheless likely that across the board, in both secular and ecclesiastical contexts, royal authorities structured their lands in a similar fashion, with estate centres surrounded by a network of specialised dependent settlements. This chapter explores the impact of the conversion on burial rites and mortuary topography in early medieval Wessex. Can we, for example, identify cemeteries associated with church foundations from an early date, or does burial location continue to be influenced by other factors?","PeriodicalId":285541,"journal":{"name":"Burial, Landscape and Identity in Early Medieval Wessex","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burial, Landscape and Identity in Early Medieval Wessex","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvd58stg.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the words of Alan Everitt, ‘the church has had a greater impact on the landscape and economy … than any other human agency.’ Granted, Everitt was referring specifically in this case to Kent, which was of course subject to a set of circumstances that were in many ways distinct from those experienced by other areas of southern England. Still, the transformations wrought by the ascendancy of Christianity can be as keenly recognised in Wessex as elsewhere. Any radical change to a dominant religious or political order can provoke or expedite tangible changes in how the landscape is structured and exploited – within, of course, the constraints of the physical environment: geology, soils, topography and climate. What was uniquely transformative about the influence of the Roman Church in the Middle Anglo-Saxon period was its capacity to allow elites to consolidate their power – owing in part to its innately hierarchical structure – and thus to effect change in the landscape. The Church as an institution was responsible for profound alterations in the nature of landholding. The stability afforded by perpetual ownership provided an incentive for royal powers to invest in the land and to improve productivity. Furthermore, the generation of agricultural surpluses through increasingly specialised means of production was essential for supporting the new array of ecclesiastical communities and monastic houses, which were occupied on a permanent basis, in contrast to the predominantly peripatetic royal entourages. Of course, it would be unwise to exaggerate the role of the Church as a driver of landscape change, and we must be careful not to overplay the top-down influence of elite engagement with this ascendant ideology. The fact that the vast majority of the surviving written sources for the Middle Anglo-Saxon period relate to the lands held by major minsters creates a degree of bias, in that ecclesiastical land organisation is unavoidably presented as typical. It is nevertheless likely that across the board, in both secular and ecclesiastical contexts, royal authorities structured their lands in a similar fashion, with estate centres surrounded by a network of specialised dependent settlements. This chapter explores the impact of the conversion on burial rites and mortuary topography in early medieval Wessex. Can we, for example, identify cemeteries associated with church foundations from an early date, or does burial location continue to be influenced by other factors?
教堂和葬礼景观
用艾伦·埃弗里特(Alan Everitt)的话来说,“教会对景观和经济的影响比任何其他人类机构都要大。”诚然,埃弗里特在这里特别提到了肯特郡,当然,肯特郡所处的环境在很多方面都与英格兰南部其他地区不同。尽管如此,基督教的优势所带来的转变在威塞克斯和其他地方都能被敏锐地认识到。任何对主导宗教或政治秩序的激进改变都可能引发或加速景观结构和开发方式的切实变化——当然,这是在自然环境的限制下:地质、土壤、地形和气候。在中盎格鲁-撒克逊时期,罗马教会的独特变革之处在于,它有能力让精英们巩固自己的权力——部分原因是其固有的等级结构——从而影响社会格局的变化。教会作为一个机构对土地占有性质的深刻改变负有责任。永久所有权所带来的稳定性,为王权投资土地和提高生产力提供了动力。此外,通过日益专业化的生产手段产生的农业盈余对于支持新的教会社区和修道院至关重要,这些社区和修道院是永久性的,与主要是四处游荡的王室随行人员形成对比。当然,夸大教会作为景观变化驱动者的作用是不明智的,我们必须小心,不要夸大精英参与这种新兴意识形态的自上而下的影响。事实上,绝大多数中古盎格鲁-撒克逊时期幸存的书面资料都与主要部长所拥有的土地有关,这造成了一定程度的偏见,因为教会的土地组织不可避免地被呈现为典型。然而,在世俗和教会背景下,王室当局可能以类似的方式构建他们的土地,地产中心被专门的依赖定居点网络所包围。本章探讨了中世纪早期威塞克斯的丧葬仪式和殡仪馆地形的转变的影响。例如,我们能否从早期就识别出与教堂基础相关的墓地,或者埋葬地点是否继续受到其他因素的影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信