Thermal raman and IR measurement of heterogeneous integration stacks

T. R. Harris, G. Pavlidis, Eric J. Wyers, D. Marshal Newberry, S. Graham, P. Franzon, W. R. Davis
{"title":"Thermal raman and IR measurement of heterogeneous integration stacks","authors":"T. R. Harris, G. Pavlidis, Eric J. Wyers, D. Marshal Newberry, S. Graham, P. Franzon, W. R. Davis","doi":"10.1109/ITHERM.2016.7517727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thermal management and planning is important for heterogeneous integration due to the introduction of a complex thermal path. Thermal measurement of operating devices provides necessary data points for future design as well as validation of models. In this paper, two methods for measuring thermal performance of DAHI (Diverse Accessible Heterogeneous Integration) GaN HEMTs are presented and contrasted: IR microscopy and micro Raman spectroscopy. The QFI IR system uses a per-pixel material emissivity flat temperature calibration when the device is in an off-state, and then calculates operating temperatures by CCD exposure. Two separate QFI systems with differing CCD resolutions were used to collect thermal data and are compared. Raman Thermometry by contrast, is a laser point measurement of the frequency shift in scattered photons due to phonon vibrational modes whose frequencies are temperature dependent. Differences in measurements between the two methods arising from the stack of materials used in the DAHI process and their transparency are discussed. A method for measuring the surface temperature of the devices through Raman by the use of TiO2 nanoparticles is also presented in conjunction with a profile of the HEMT. Measurements are presented alongside thermal simulation results using prototype software Mentor Graphics™ Calibre®.","PeriodicalId":426908,"journal":{"name":"2016 15th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 15th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHERM.2016.7517727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Thermal management and planning is important for heterogeneous integration due to the introduction of a complex thermal path. Thermal measurement of operating devices provides necessary data points for future design as well as validation of models. In this paper, two methods for measuring thermal performance of DAHI (Diverse Accessible Heterogeneous Integration) GaN HEMTs are presented and contrasted: IR microscopy and micro Raman spectroscopy. The QFI IR system uses a per-pixel material emissivity flat temperature calibration when the device is in an off-state, and then calculates operating temperatures by CCD exposure. Two separate QFI systems with differing CCD resolutions were used to collect thermal data and are compared. Raman Thermometry by contrast, is a laser point measurement of the frequency shift in scattered photons due to phonon vibrational modes whose frequencies are temperature dependent. Differences in measurements between the two methods arising from the stack of materials used in the DAHI process and their transparency are discussed. A method for measuring the surface temperature of the devices through Raman by the use of TiO2 nanoparticles is also presented in conjunction with a profile of the HEMT. Measurements are presented alongside thermal simulation results using prototype software Mentor Graphics™ Calibre®.
异质集成电路的热拉曼和红外测量
由于引入了复杂的热路径,热管理和规划对于异质集成非常重要。操作装置的热测量为将来的设计和模型验证提供了必要的数据点。本文介绍了两种测量DAHI(不同可及异构集成)GaN hemt热性能的方法,并对其进行了对比:红外显微镜和微拉曼光谱。当设备处于关闭状态时,QFI红外系统使用逐像素材料发射率平面温度校准,然后通过CCD曝光计算工作温度。采用不同CCD分辨率的两个独立QFI系统采集热数据,并进行了比较。相比之下,拉曼测温是一种激光点测量散射光子的频移,这是由于声子振动模式的频率与温度有关。讨论了两种测量方法之间的差异,这些差异是由DAHI过程中使用的材料堆叠和它们的透明度引起的。本文还提出了一种利用TiO2纳米粒子通过拉曼光谱测量器件表面温度的方法,并结合了HEMT的轮廓。测量结果与使用原型软件Mentor Graphics™Calibre®的热模拟结果一起呈现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信