Perlindungan Hukum Perawatan Paksa Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa

Eddhie Praptono, Erwin Adiyta Pratama
{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Perawatan Paksa Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa","authors":"Eddhie Praptono, Erwin Adiyta Pratama","doi":"10.24905/diktum.v9i1.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most treatments of people with mental disorders (ODGJ) are forced or involuntary care. Human rights ensure that persons with disabilities are entitled to enjoy independence based on equality with others. Deprivation of liberty is allowed only if it is lawful and is done without arbitrary. The criminal law has set a ban on the deprivation of independence if it meets all its elements. The study examined whether the forced treatment of people with mental disorders in Indonesia when analyzed, associated with deprivation of independence, is a violation of criminal law and human rights, and how harmonization with forced care regulations. The results of this study show that the deprivation of independence in forced care in health institutions does not meet the elements of unlawful acts because there are clear rules, while in non-health institutions there are no clear rules and there may be acts of deprivation of independence that need further research. Forced Care needs to be harmonized with the current Law, namely: Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Health; Law No. 18 of 2014 on Mental Health; and Law No. 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities.","PeriodicalId":297417,"journal":{"name":"Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diktum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24905/diktum.v9i1.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most treatments of people with mental disorders (ODGJ) are forced or involuntary care. Human rights ensure that persons with disabilities are entitled to enjoy independence based on equality with others. Deprivation of liberty is allowed only if it is lawful and is done without arbitrary. The criminal law has set a ban on the deprivation of independence if it meets all its elements. The study examined whether the forced treatment of people with mental disorders in Indonesia when analyzed, associated with deprivation of independence, is a violation of criminal law and human rights, and how harmonization with forced care regulations. The results of this study show that the deprivation of independence in forced care in health institutions does not meet the elements of unlawful acts because there are clear rules, while in non-health institutions there are no clear rules and there may be acts of deprivation of independence that need further research. Forced Care needs to be harmonized with the current Law, namely: Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Health; Law No. 18 of 2014 on Mental Health; and Law No. 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities.
对有精神障碍的人的强制性保护法律
对精神障碍患者的大多数治疗是强迫或非自愿护理。人权保障残疾人在与其他人平等的基础上享有独立自主的权利。剥夺自由只有在合法且不任意的情况下才被允许。刑法禁止在符合其所有要素的情况下剥夺独立。这项研究调查了印度尼西亚对精神障碍患者的强迫治疗是否与剥夺独立性有关,是否违反了刑法和人权,以及如何与强迫治疗法规协调一致。本研究结果表明,卫生机构强迫护理中剥夺独立性的行为不符合非法行为的构成要件,因为有明确的规定,而在非卫生机构中,没有明确的规定,可能存在剥夺独立性的行为,需要进一步研究。强制照料需要与现行法律相协调,即:2009年关于保健的第32号法;2014年关于精神健康的第18号法;2016年关于残疾人的第8号法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信