Bite mark: Is it still valid??

A. Arthanari, N. Doggalli, K. Patil, H. Jai Shankar, A. Vidhya
{"title":"Bite mark: Is it still valid??","authors":"A. Arthanari, N. Doggalli, K. Patil, H. Jai Shankar, A. Vidhya","doi":"10.4103/ijfo.ijfo_4_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bite mark evidence has been introduced in trials all over the country. Bite mark evidence, an aspect of forensic odontology, is the process by which odontologist's (dentists) attempt to match marks found at crime scenes with the dental impressions of suspects. If a victim is bitten by a perpetrator during a crime and police have a suspect, odontologists can attempt to “match” the bite mark to the suspect's teeth. There have been a lot of controversies in the identification of bite mark analysis in the past 15 years and acceptance by the law. While this review aims to explain the increasing number of wrongful convictions that is associated and related to the past with bite mark analyses and this has resulted in intense scientific and legal scrutiny. This article contains the current status and position of bite mark analysis. It explains about the highlights and drawback of bite mark identification and law's evaluating and responding to unreliable and unscientific evidence.","PeriodicalId":426743,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forensic Odontology","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forensic Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijfo.ijfo_4_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Bite mark evidence has been introduced in trials all over the country. Bite mark evidence, an aspect of forensic odontology, is the process by which odontologist's (dentists) attempt to match marks found at crime scenes with the dental impressions of suspects. If a victim is bitten by a perpetrator during a crime and police have a suspect, odontologists can attempt to “match” the bite mark to the suspect's teeth. There have been a lot of controversies in the identification of bite mark analysis in the past 15 years and acceptance by the law. While this review aims to explain the increasing number of wrongful convictions that is associated and related to the past with bite mark analyses and this has resulted in intense scientific and legal scrutiny. This article contains the current status and position of bite mark analysis. It explains about the highlights and drawback of bite mark identification and law's evaluating and responding to unreliable and unscientific evidence.
咬痕:还有效吗?
咬痕证据已被引入全国各地的审判。咬痕证据是法医牙科学的一个方面,是牙科医生试图将犯罪现场发现的咬痕与嫌疑人的牙印相匹配的过程。如果受害者在犯罪过程中被犯罪者咬伤,而警方有嫌疑人,牙科医生可以尝试将咬痕与嫌疑人的牙齿“匹配”。近15年来,在咬痕分析鉴定和法律认可方面存在很多争议。虽然这篇评论的目的是解释越来越多的错误定罪,这与过去的咬痕分析有关,这导致了激烈的科学和法律审查。本文介绍了咬痕分析的现状和地位。阐述了咬痕鉴定的优点和缺点,以及法律对不可靠和不科学证据的评价和应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信