Evaluation of Static Web Vulnerability Analysis Tools

Shobha Tyagi, Krishan Kumar
{"title":"Evaluation of Static Web Vulnerability Analysis Tools","authors":"Shobha Tyagi, Krishan Kumar","doi":"10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent years many web applications of different kinds has grown significanlty all over the world. Unfortunately on the other hand, there is an increase in the number of attacks on these applications. Hence, security against web application vulnerabilities become necessary. However, checking all web vulnerabilities manually is tedious and needs much effort and skills. So the use of web application vulnerability scanners becomes necessary. Many static and dynamic, open source and commercial vulnerability analysis tools are available. In this paper, we evaluate two open source, static web application vulnerability analyses tools, OWASP WAP and RIPS using the deliberately vulnerable web application. These are Damn Vulnerable Web Application (DVWA) and A Buggy Web Application (bWAPP). OWASP WAP and RIPS tools are selected as they are open source static tools WAP is recommended by OWASP and RIPS provide commercial versions as well. We used deliberately vulnerable web applications so that the vulnerabilities detected could be easily analyzed whether they are true positive or false positive. We found that OWASP WAP give better results over RIPS in our experimental scenario.","PeriodicalId":303401,"journal":{"name":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the recent years many web applications of different kinds has grown significanlty all over the world. Unfortunately on the other hand, there is an increase in the number of attacks on these applications. Hence, security against web application vulnerabilities become necessary. However, checking all web vulnerabilities manually is tedious and needs much effort and skills. So the use of web application vulnerability scanners becomes necessary. Many static and dynamic, open source and commercial vulnerability analysis tools are available. In this paper, we evaluate two open source, static web application vulnerability analyses tools, OWASP WAP and RIPS using the deliberately vulnerable web application. These are Damn Vulnerable Web Application (DVWA) and A Buggy Web Application (bWAPP). OWASP WAP and RIPS tools are selected as they are open source static tools WAP is recommended by OWASP and RIPS provide commercial versions as well. We used deliberately vulnerable web applications so that the vulnerabilities detected could be easily analyzed whether they are true positive or false positive. We found that OWASP WAP give better results over RIPS in our experimental scenario.
静态Web漏洞分析工具的评估
近年来,许多不同类型的web应用程序在世界各地都有了显著的发展。另一方面,不幸的是,针对这些应用程序的攻击数量正在增加。因此,针对web应用程序漏洞的安全性变得非常必要。然而,手动检查所有web漏洞是乏味的,需要大量的精力和技能。因此,使用web应用程序漏洞扫描器变得很有必要。有许多静态和动态、开源和商业漏洞分析工具可用。在本文中,我们使用故意易受攻击的web应用程序来评估两种开源的静态web应用程序漏洞分析工具OWASP WAP和RIPS。这些是该死的易受攻击的Web应用程序(DVWA)和一个有bug的Web应用程序(bWAPP)。之所以选择OWASP WAP和RIPS工具,是因为它们都是开源的静态工具,WAP是OWASP推荐的,RIPS也提供商业版本。我们故意使用易受攻击的web应用程序,以便可以轻松分析检测到的漏洞是真阳性还是假阳性。在我们的实验场景中,我们发现OWASP WAP比RIPS提供了更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信