First-Order and Monadic Second-Order Model-Checking on Ordered Structures

Viktor Engelmann, S. Kreutzer, S. Siebertz
{"title":"First-Order and Monadic Second-Order Model-Checking on Ordered Structures","authors":"Viktor Engelmann, S. Kreutzer, S. Siebertz","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2012.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-checking for first- and monadic second-order logic in the context of graphs has received considerable attention in the literature. It is well-known that the problem of verifying whether a formula of these logics is true in a graph is computationally intractable but it does become tractable on interesting classes of graphs such as classes of bounded tree-width. In this paper we continue this line of research but study model checking for first- and monadic second-order logic in the presence of an ordering on the input structure. We do so in two settings: the general ordered case, where the input structures are equipped with a fixed order or successor relation, and the order invariant case, where the formulas may resort to an ordering but their truth must be independent of the particular choice of order. In the first setting we show very strong intractability results for most interesting classes of graphs. In contrast, in order invariant case we obtain tractability results for order invariant monadic second-order logic on the same classes of graphs as in the unordered case. For first-order logic, we obtain tractability of successor-invariant FO on planar graphs.","PeriodicalId":407972,"journal":{"name":"2012 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 27th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2012.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Model-checking for first- and monadic second-order logic in the context of graphs has received considerable attention in the literature. It is well-known that the problem of verifying whether a formula of these logics is true in a graph is computationally intractable but it does become tractable on interesting classes of graphs such as classes of bounded tree-width. In this paper we continue this line of research but study model checking for first- and monadic second-order logic in the presence of an ordering on the input structure. We do so in two settings: the general ordered case, where the input structures are equipped with a fixed order or successor relation, and the order invariant case, where the formulas may resort to an ordering but their truth must be independent of the particular choice of order. In the first setting we show very strong intractability results for most interesting classes of graphs. In contrast, in order invariant case we obtain tractability results for order invariant monadic second-order logic on the same classes of graphs as in the unordered case. For first-order logic, we obtain tractability of successor-invariant FO on planar graphs.
有序结构的一阶和一元二阶模型检验
在图的背景下,一阶和一元二阶逻辑的模型检查在文献中得到了相当大的关注。众所周知,在图中验证这些逻辑的公式是否正确的问题在计算上是难以处理的,但在有趣的图类(如有界树宽度的类)上确实变得容易处理。在本文中,我们继续这方面的研究,但研究一阶和一元二阶逻辑在输入结构上存在排序时的模型检验。我们在两种情况下这样做:一般有序情况,其中输入结构具有固定的顺序或后继关系,以及顺序不变情况,其中公式可以诉诸于排序,但其正确性必须独立于特定的顺序选择。在第一种情况下,我们对大多数有趣的图类显示了很强的难解性结果。相反,在序不变情况下,我们得到了序不变一元二阶逻辑在同一类图上与无序情况下的可跟踪性结果。对于一阶逻辑,我们得到了平面图上后继不变FO的可跟踪性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信