Examining the Effects of Student Participation and Performance on the Quality of Learnersourcing Multiple-Choice Questions

Steven Moore, Huy A. Nguyen, John C. Stamper
{"title":"Examining the Effects of Student Participation and Performance on the Quality of Learnersourcing Multiple-Choice Questions","authors":"Steven Moore, Huy A. Nguyen, John C. Stamper","doi":"10.1145/3430895.3460140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While generating multiple-choice questions has been shown to promote deep learning, students often fail to realize this benefit and do not willingly participate in this activity. Additionally, the quality of the student-generated questions may be influenced by both their level of engagement and familiarity with the learning materials. Towards better understanding how students can generate high quality questions, we designed and deployed a multiple-choice question generation activity in seven college-level online chemistry courses. From these courses, we collected data on student interactions and their contribution to the question-generation task. A total of 201 students enrolled in the courses and 57 of them elected to generate a multiple-choice question. Our results indicated that students were able to contribute quality questions, with 67% of them being evaluated by experts as acceptable for use. We further identified several student behaviors in the online courses that are correlated to their participation in the task and the quality of their contribution. Our findings can help teachers and students better understand the benefits of student-generated questions and effectively implement future learnersourcing activities.","PeriodicalId":125581,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3430895.3460140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

While generating multiple-choice questions has been shown to promote deep learning, students often fail to realize this benefit and do not willingly participate in this activity. Additionally, the quality of the student-generated questions may be influenced by both their level of engagement and familiarity with the learning materials. Towards better understanding how students can generate high quality questions, we designed and deployed a multiple-choice question generation activity in seven college-level online chemistry courses. From these courses, we collected data on student interactions and their contribution to the question-generation task. A total of 201 students enrolled in the courses and 57 of them elected to generate a multiple-choice question. Our results indicated that students were able to contribute quality questions, with 67% of them being evaluated by experts as acceptable for use. We further identified several student behaviors in the online courses that are correlated to their participation in the task and the quality of their contribution. Our findings can help teachers and students better understand the benefits of student-generated questions and effectively implement future learnersourcing activities.
考察学生参与和表现对学习者源选择题质量的影响
虽然生成多项选择题已被证明可以促进深度学习,但学生往往没有意识到这一好处,也不愿意参与这项活动。此外,学生提出的问题的质量可能受到他们的参与程度和对学习材料的熟悉程度的影响。为了更好地理解学生是如何生成高质量问题的,我们在七门大学水平的在线化学课程中设计并部署了一个选择题生成活动。从这些课程中,我们收集了学生互动的数据以及他们对问题生成任务的贡献。共有201名学生参加了这些课程,其中57人被选出来做多项选择题。我们的结果表明,学生能够提供高质量的问题,其中67%的问题被专家评估为可接受的使用。我们进一步确定了在线课程中与他们参与任务和贡献质量相关的几个学生行为。我们的研究结果可以帮助教师和学生更好地理解学生提出问题的好处,并有效地实施未来的学习者资源活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信