Identifying Clusters and Themes from Incidents Related to Health Information Technology in Medical Imaging as a Basis for Improvements in Practice

M. S. Jabin, F. Magrabi, P. Hibbert, T. Schultz, W. Runciman
{"title":"Identifying Clusters and Themes from Incidents Related to Health Information Technology in Medical Imaging as a Basis for Improvements in Practice","authors":"M. S. Jabin, F. Magrabi, P. Hibbert, T. Schultz, W. Runciman","doi":"10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beyond identifying and counting the things that go wrong, understanding how and why they go wrong requires qualitative research, especially for low-frequency events. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize patient safety and quality issues related to health information technology (HIT) in medical imaging by collecting and analyzing incident reports through the lens of thematic analysis. In this article, we analyze 5 clusters: Staff related issues (16%), issues with diagnosis (15%), HIT incidents that involved “paper record” (12%), information and communication related (4%), and “action taken” related issues (4%). Human factors involved people failing to scan forms into the computer system (consents, requests, bookings, questionnaires, assessments, treatments and prescriptions), and another 4% involved failure to enter verbally imparted information into the system (about infectious patients, cancelled cases, and the status of reports). All of these problems had their genesis in human errors and violations. Human factors were found to cause more deleterious effects than technical factors. Of three instances of deaths caused by diagnostic issues, two were triggered by human factors, missed diagnosis. However, “staff or organizational outcome” was evenly distributed for both human and technical factors. It was therefore important to identify and characterize these incidents related to health information technology in medical imaging through the lens of thematic analysis, to provide a basis for improvements in preventing issues and improving clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":117219,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Beyond identifying and counting the things that go wrong, understanding how and why they go wrong requires qualitative research, especially for low-frequency events. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize patient safety and quality issues related to health information technology (HIT) in medical imaging by collecting and analyzing incident reports through the lens of thematic analysis. In this article, we analyze 5 clusters: Staff related issues (16%), issues with diagnosis (15%), HIT incidents that involved “paper record” (12%), information and communication related (4%), and “action taken” related issues (4%). Human factors involved people failing to scan forms into the computer system (consents, requests, bookings, questionnaires, assessments, treatments and prescriptions), and another 4% involved failure to enter verbally imparted information into the system (about infectious patients, cancelled cases, and the status of reports). All of these problems had their genesis in human errors and violations. Human factors were found to cause more deleterious effects than technical factors. Of three instances of deaths caused by diagnostic issues, two were triggered by human factors, missed diagnosis. However, “staff or organizational outcome” was evenly distributed for both human and technical factors. It was therefore important to identify and characterize these incidents related to health information technology in medical imaging through the lens of thematic analysis, to provide a basis for improvements in preventing issues and improving clinical practice.
识别与医疗成像中健康信息技术相关的事件集群和主题,作为改进实践的基础
除了识别和计算出错的事情之外,理解它们如何以及为什么出错需要定性研究,特别是对于低频事件。本研究的目的是透过专题分析的视角,透过收集及分析事件报告,找出与医疗影像中健康资讯科技(HIT)相关的病患安全和品质问题。在本文中,我们分析了5个集群:员工相关问题(16%),诊断问题(15%),涉及“纸质记录”的HIT事件(12%),信息和沟通相关(4%),以及“采取的行动”相关问题(4%)。人为因素涉及人员未能将表格扫描到计算机系统(同意、请求、预订、问卷、评估、治疗和处方),另外4%涉及未能将口头传递的信息输入系统(关于感染患者、取消病例和报告状态)。所有这些问题都源于人为的错误和违规。研究发现,人为因素比技术因素造成的有害影响更大。在诊断问题造成的三例死亡中,有两例是由人为因素、漏诊引起的。然而,对于人力和技术因素,“员工或组织结果”是均匀分布的。因此,必须从专题分析的角度确定和描述这些与医疗成像中的保健信息技术有关的事件,以便为改进预防问题和改进临床实践提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信