Dualistic Portfolio Strategies in Japanese Scholarly Publishing: Cultures and Interests in Interaction

Ikuya Sato
{"title":"Dualistic Portfolio Strategies in Japanese Scholarly Publishing: Cultures and Interests in Interaction","authors":"Ikuya Sato","doi":"10.15057/4791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of a number of findings from a preliminary interview research, this paper presents and refines an analytical framework for an ethnographic research on the structural transformation of the scholarly publishing in Japan. One of the key concepts in the analytical framework is “dualistic portfolio strategy.” Dualistic portfolio strategy is a sensitizing concept by which we can conceptualize the process in which several types of actors involved in scholarly publishing pursue their own interests deploying symbolic as well as economic capitals and by combining several types of institutional logics. This concept refers both to “strategies of action,” or habitual ways of perceiving, thinking, feeling and acting (Swidler 1986, 2001) and to a more conscious and deliberate action plan aimed at pursuing relatively articulated interests. Inclusion of these two otherwise contrastive meanings in one term is intended to capture the dialectics between human agency and cultural determination. It will be argued that in analyzing institutional changes, we have to take account of the specific social contexts in which di#erent action strategies of individuals are integrated into deliberate action plans. Actors’ interests themselves are often “discovered” (or invented) and articulated in that","PeriodicalId":154016,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/4791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On the basis of a number of findings from a preliminary interview research, this paper presents and refines an analytical framework for an ethnographic research on the structural transformation of the scholarly publishing in Japan. One of the key concepts in the analytical framework is “dualistic portfolio strategy.” Dualistic portfolio strategy is a sensitizing concept by which we can conceptualize the process in which several types of actors involved in scholarly publishing pursue their own interests deploying symbolic as well as economic capitals and by combining several types of institutional logics. This concept refers both to “strategies of action,” or habitual ways of perceiving, thinking, feeling and acting (Swidler 1986, 2001) and to a more conscious and deliberate action plan aimed at pursuing relatively articulated interests. Inclusion of these two otherwise contrastive meanings in one term is intended to capture the dialectics between human agency and cultural determination. It will be argued that in analyzing institutional changes, we have to take account of the specific social contexts in which di#erent action strategies of individuals are integrated into deliberate action plans. Actors’ interests themselves are often “discovered” (or invented) and articulated in that
日本学术出版的二元组合策略:互动中的文化与兴趣
本文在初步访谈研究的基础上,提出并完善了日本学术出版结构变迁的民族志研究分析框架。分析框架中的一个关键概念是“二元投资组合策略”。二元投资组合策略是一个敏感的概念,通过它,我们可以概念化参与学术出版的几种类型的行动者通过结合几种类型的制度逻辑,利用象征资本和经济资本追求自己的利益的过程。这个概念既指“行动策略”,也指感知、思考、感觉和行动的习惯方式(Swidler 1986, 2001),也指旨在追求相对明确的利益的更有意识、更深思熟虑的行动计划。将这两种相反的含义包含在一个术语中是为了捕捉人类能动性和文化决定之间的辩证法。有人认为,在分析制度变化时,我们必须考虑到特定的社会背景,在这种背景下,个人的不同行动策略被纳入深思熟虑的行动计划。演员的兴趣往往是被“发现”(或发明)并在其中表达出来的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信