Can first-year students program yet?: a study revisited

R. McCartney, Jonas Boustedt, Anna Eckerdal, Kate Sanders, Carol Zander
{"title":"Can first-year students program yet?: a study revisited","authors":"R. McCartney, Jonas Boustedt, Anna Eckerdal, Kate Sanders, Carol Zander","doi":"10.1145/2493394.2493412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The McCracken et al. working group paper is often cited for the proposition that students can't program. In that study, students from four different institutions were each assigned to implement one of three versions of a calculator. More than half of the students failed to produce a program that compiled and executed in the time assigned. Lost in this discussion, however, is the fact that the original paper had the goal of evaluating its instrument, as well as the students. We examine and adjust their instrument, and present the results of the revised study. With a modifed instrument, we have obtained significantly improved results.","PeriodicalId":417662,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

The McCracken et al. working group paper is often cited for the proposition that students can't program. In that study, students from four different institutions were each assigned to implement one of three versions of a calculator. More than half of the students failed to produce a program that compiled and executed in the time assigned. Lost in this discussion, however, is the fact that the original paper had the goal of evaluating its instrument, as well as the students. We examine and adjust their instrument, and present the results of the revised study. With a modifed instrument, we have obtained significantly improved results.
一年级学生可以学习了吗?重新审视的研究
McCracken等人的工作组论文经常被引用,因为它提出学生不会编程。在那项研究中,来自四所不同院校的学生被分配使用三种版本的计算器中的一种。超过一半的学生未能在规定的时间内编写出编译并执行的程序。然而,在这个讨论中忽略了一个事实,即原始论文的目标是评估其仪器,以及学生。我们检查和调整了他们的仪器,并提出了修订后的研究结果。通过改进后的仪器,我们获得了明显改善的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信