Recruiting collapsed lung through collateral channels with positive end-expiratory pressure.

J B Andersen, J Qvist, T Kann
{"title":"Recruiting collapsed lung through collateral channels with positive end-expiratory pressure.","authors":"J B Andersen,&nbsp;J Qvist,&nbsp;T Kann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We studied reinflation of collapsed parts in excised normal human lungs through both the ordinary bronchial route and through collateral channels. A model of atelectasis was made either by simple collapse or by applying a positive pressure to the pleura and a negative to the airway. Five different ventilatory patterns were used for reinflation: simulated normal breathing with and without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), simulated deep breathing and mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). All methods, except normal breathing without CPAP, reinflated the collapsed part with pressures well within the range used clinically. The most effective way of re-expanding collapsed lung was the application of CPAP during simulated normal breathing or PEEP during mechanical ventilation, which required smaller transpulmonary pressure swings than the other methods. A comparison between CPAP and PEEP showed CPAP to be preferable. Collateral reinflation occurred just as readily as normal reinflation and the results suggest that collateral reinflation is the primary choice. This route of reexpansion also has a potential secretion clearing effect in that pressure is built up distal to an obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21508,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases","volume":"60 5","pages":"260-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We studied reinflation of collapsed parts in excised normal human lungs through both the ordinary bronchial route and through collateral channels. A model of atelectasis was made either by simple collapse or by applying a positive pressure to the pleura and a negative to the airway. Five different ventilatory patterns were used for reinflation: simulated normal breathing with and without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), simulated deep breathing and mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). All methods, except normal breathing without CPAP, reinflated the collapsed part with pressures well within the range used clinically. The most effective way of re-expanding collapsed lung was the application of CPAP during simulated normal breathing or PEEP during mechanical ventilation, which required smaller transpulmonary pressure swings than the other methods. A comparison between CPAP and PEEP showed CPAP to be preferable. Collateral reinflation occurred just as readily as normal reinflation and the results suggest that collateral reinflation is the primary choice. This route of reexpansion also has a potential secretion clearing effect in that pressure is built up distal to an obstruction.

经侧枝经呼气末正压恢复萎陷肺。
我们研究了正常人肺切除后塌陷部分通过普通支气管通道和侧支通道的再膨胀。通过简单的塌陷或对胸膜施加正压而对气道施加负压来制作肺不张模型。再充气采用5种不同的通气模式:模拟正常呼吸,有无持续气道正压通气(CPAP),模拟深呼吸和机械通气,有无呼气末正压通气(PEEP)。除不使用CPAP的正常呼吸外,所有方法对塌陷部位的再充气压力均在临床使用范围内。再扩张萎陷肺最有效的方法是在模拟正常呼吸时应用CPAP或机械通气时应用PEEP,比其他方法需要更小的肺压波动。CPAP与PEEP的比较显示CPAP优于CPAP。抵押品再通胀与正常的再通胀一样容易发生,结果表明抵押品再通胀是主要选择。这种再扩张途径也有潜在的分泌物清除作用,因为压力是在梗阻远端建立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书