A preliminary comparison of computer mediated training tools

J. Paynter, J. Ong, Lorelle Frazer
{"title":"A preliminary comparison of computer mediated training tools","authors":"J. Paynter, J. Ong, Lorelle Frazer","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2000.896726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various factors are leading organisations to deliver flexible learning via the Internet. These pressures include the need to be seen to be using the latest technology, the demand from users away from traditional courses to ones that can deliver anytime, anywhere and lastly to escape from the need to provide expensive classrooms and laboratories. There are different proprietary and off-the-shelf solutions capable of delivering teaching material to the Internet and assessing students. Yet there has been little research on the effectiveness of these vehicles from the view points of course content, authors, instructors and students. The research evaluates two contrasting flexible learning sites drawing upon the experiences of authors and instructors and through surveying the students via the WAMMI questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":404621,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2000.896726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Various factors are leading organisations to deliver flexible learning via the Internet. These pressures include the need to be seen to be using the latest technology, the demand from users away from traditional courses to ones that can deliver anytime, anywhere and lastly to escape from the need to provide expensive classrooms and laboratories. There are different proprietary and off-the-shelf solutions capable of delivering teaching material to the Internet and assessing students. Yet there has been little research on the effectiveness of these vehicles from the view points of course content, authors, instructors and students. The research evaluates two contrasting flexible learning sites drawing upon the experiences of authors and instructors and through surveying the students via the WAMMI questionnaire.
计算机培训工具的初步比较
各种因素促使组织通过互联网提供灵活的学习。这些压力包括需要被视为使用最新技术,用户需要从传统课程转向可以随时随地提供的课程,最后摆脱对提供昂贵教室和实验室的需求。有不同的专有和现成的解决方案能够将教材发布到互联网上并评估学生。然而,很少有人从课程内容、作者、教师和学生的角度对这些工具的有效性进行研究。根据作者和教师的经验,并通过WAMMI问卷调查学生,本研究评估了两种截然不同的灵活学习场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信