Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction

حنان خضارى مهدى محمود
{"title":"Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction","authors":"حنان خضارى مهدى محمود","doi":"10.21608/cfdj.2023.258074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare is the cornerstone of a cohesive society and there are many diseases threaten human life. Cardiovascular diseases are one of them. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a group of heart and blood vessel problems. They include coronary heart diseases, which affect the blood vessels that supply the heart muscle; cerebrovascular illnesses, which affect the blood vessels that supply the brain; and peripheral arterial diseases, which affect the blood vessels that supply the arms and legs. In this study machine learning algorithms for adaptive perdition of cardiovascular diseases are proposed. This study aims to significantly reduce the potential failure of machine learning algorithms to predict cardiovascular diseases. This is performed by comparing seven machine learning models: Random Forest, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Boosting (Adaboost), Nave Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Logistic Regression (LR). In the proposed research, four Kaggles were selected, and the dataset relied on ten years of historical records with 13 technical features. Furthermore, seven models of machine learning (Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaboost, SVM, Naive Bayes, KNN, and Logistic Regression) were utilized as predictors. The input values of the methods are also used to produce three different measures for evaluations.","PeriodicalId":354519,"journal":{"name":"المجلة العلمیة للدراسات والبحوث المالیة والتجاریة","volume":"408 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"المجلة العلمیة للدراسات والبحوث المالیة والتجاریة","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/cfdj.2023.258074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare is the cornerstone of a cohesive society and there are many diseases threaten human life. Cardiovascular diseases are one of them. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a group of heart and blood vessel problems. They include coronary heart diseases, which affect the blood vessels that supply the heart muscle; cerebrovascular illnesses, which affect the blood vessels that supply the brain; and peripheral arterial diseases, which affect the blood vessels that supply the arms and legs. In this study machine learning algorithms for adaptive perdition of cardiovascular diseases are proposed. This study aims to significantly reduce the potential failure of machine learning algorithms to predict cardiovascular diseases. This is performed by comparing seven machine learning models: Random Forest, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Boosting (Adaboost), Nave Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Logistic Regression (LR). In the proposed research, four Kaggles were selected, and the dataset relied on ten years of historical records with 13 technical features. Furthermore, seven models of machine learning (Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaboost, SVM, Naive Bayes, KNN, and Logistic Regression) were utilized as predictors. The input values of the methods are also used to produce three different measures for evaluations.
心血管疾病预测的机器学习算法比较
医疗保健是社会凝聚力的基石,有许多疾病威胁着人类的生命。心血管疾病就是其中之一。心血管疾病(cvd)是一组心脏和血管问题。这些疾病包括冠心病,它会影响供应心肌的血管;脑血管疾病,影响供应大脑的血管;外周动脉疾病,影响到供应胳膊和腿的血管。本文提出了一种用于心血管疾病自适应预测的机器学习算法。本研究旨在显著减少机器学习算法预测心血管疾病的潜在失败。这是通过比较七个机器学习模型来完成的:随机森林、决策树、支持向量机(SVM)、自适应增强(Adaboost)、中贝叶斯、k近邻(KNN)和逻辑回归(LR)。在拟议的研究中,选择了四个Kaggles,数据集依赖于具有13个技术特征的10年历史记录。此外,七种机器学习模型(决策树、随机森林、Adaboost、SVM、朴素贝叶斯、KNN和逻辑回归)被用作预测因子。这些方法的输入值还用于产生三种不同的评估措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信