Excitement and Concerns about Machine Learning-Based Chatbots and Talkbots: A Survey

Pablo Rivas, Kerstin Holzmayer, Cristian Hernandez, Charles Grippaldi
{"title":"Excitement and Concerns about Machine Learning-Based Chatbots and Talkbots: A Survey","authors":"Pablo Rivas, Kerstin Holzmayer, Cristian Hernandez, Charles Grippaldi","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chatbots and talkbots are intelligent programs that can establish written and oral communication with human beings, usually with the purpose of helping them achieve a specific goal. More and more companies are now implementing bots in order to reduce operational costs. Most bots use machine learning algorithms that are deployed on companies websites, cloud services, or distributed mobile systems so that customers are always able to speak with ‘someone’ to inquire about products or services. Most bots are trained using data from interactions among human beings so that they can learn speech patterns and answer questions. In this paper we present the results of an experiment designed to survey people’s perception of these bots and how much people trust them. We present a moral dilemma to the respondents and ask questions about permissiveness and assess if bots are judged and blamed differently than their human counterparts. In this paper we reveal such differences in judgement, which suggest that many people hold the chatbots to similar behavioral standards than human beings; however, bots receive blame just as humans do.","PeriodicalId":122477,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Chatbots and talkbots are intelligent programs that can establish written and oral communication with human beings, usually with the purpose of helping them achieve a specific goal. More and more companies are now implementing bots in order to reduce operational costs. Most bots use machine learning algorithms that are deployed on companies websites, cloud services, or distributed mobile systems so that customers are always able to speak with ‘someone’ to inquire about products or services. Most bots are trained using data from interactions among human beings so that they can learn speech patterns and answer questions. In this paper we present the results of an experiment designed to survey people’s perception of these bots and how much people trust them. We present a moral dilemma to the respondents and ask questions about permissiveness and assess if bots are judged and blamed differently than their human counterparts. In this paper we reveal such differences in judgement, which suggest that many people hold the chatbots to similar behavioral standards than human beings; however, bots receive blame just as humans do.
基于机器学习的聊天机器人和可说话机器人的兴奋和担忧:一项调查
聊天机器人和聊天机器人是智能程序,可以与人类建立书面和口头交流,通常是为了帮助他们实现特定的目标。为了降低运营成本,越来越多的公司正在实施机器人。大多数机器人使用部署在公司网站、云服务或分布式移动系统上的机器学习算法,以便客户始终能够与“某人”交谈以询问产品或服务。大多数机器人都是使用人类互动的数据来训练的,这样它们就可以学习语言模式并回答问题。在本文中,我们展示了一项实验的结果,该实验旨在调查人们对这些机器人的看法以及人们对它们的信任程度。我们向受访者提出了一个道德困境,询问有关宽容的问题,并评估机器人是否受到与人类同行不同的评判和指责。在本文中,我们揭示了这种判断上的差异,这表明许多人对聊天机器人的行为标准与人类相似;然而,机器人也会像人类一样受到指责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信