THE MISSING LINK - ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Attila Pánovics
{"title":"THE MISSING LINK - ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS","authors":"Attila Pánovics","doi":"10.25234/eclic/11898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely recognized that environmental protection, social benefits and economic issues must go hand in hand. In the European Union, Environment Action Programmes (EAPs) have guided the development of EU environmental policy since the 1970s, and they have strengthened the achievement of environmental goals and the integration of environmental interests in other EU policy areas. Given their joint responsibility, EU environmental policy provides added value both for the EU and its Member States. Until the end of 2020 the 7 th EAP is the agreed framework of environmental policy-making, and discussions are underway on developing the 8 th EAP. Between 2014 and 2020, some progress has been made towards achieving the goals of the programme. For example, the 7 th EAP provided more predictability of environmental policy and facilitated Member States’ policy coordination. Nevertheless, the evaluation of the 7 th EAP proves that EU legislation is going in the right direction, but the impacts cannot be seen with actions on the ground. The environmental acquis of the EU continues to grow, but the efforts are insufficient to implement it. Broad difficulties with the coherent implementation of environmental policy can be perceived at national level, too. That is the main reason why different stakeholders (particularly environmental NGOs) play a decisive role in environmental policy-making, implementation and enforcement. The evidence base indicates that the involvement of the members of the public can reduce the enforcement deficit of EU environmental law, but more needs to be done at all levels. In October 2019, the European Council called upon the Commission to present at the latest by early 2020 an ambitious and focused proposal for the 8 th EAP (2021-2030), and underlined that the new programme must address environmental governance, such as public participation and access to justice. Hopefully, the missing link of EU environmental legislation will be resolved by the EU institutions as soon as possible.","PeriodicalId":448091,"journal":{"name":"EU 2020 – lessons from the past and solutions for the future","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU 2020 – lessons from the past and solutions for the future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely recognized that environmental protection, social benefits and economic issues must go hand in hand. In the European Union, Environment Action Programmes (EAPs) have guided the development of EU environmental policy since the 1970s, and they have strengthened the achievement of environmental goals and the integration of environmental interests in other EU policy areas. Given their joint responsibility, EU environmental policy provides added value both for the EU and its Member States. Until the end of 2020 the 7 th EAP is the agreed framework of environmental policy-making, and discussions are underway on developing the 8 th EAP. Between 2014 and 2020, some progress has been made towards achieving the goals of the programme. For example, the 7 th EAP provided more predictability of environmental policy and facilitated Member States’ policy coordination. Nevertheless, the evaluation of the 7 th EAP proves that EU legislation is going in the right direction, but the impacts cannot be seen with actions on the ground. The environmental acquis of the EU continues to grow, but the efforts are insufficient to implement it. Broad difficulties with the coherent implementation of environmental policy can be perceived at national level, too. That is the main reason why different stakeholders (particularly environmental NGOs) play a decisive role in environmental policy-making, implementation and enforcement. The evidence base indicates that the involvement of the members of the public can reduce the enforcement deficit of EU environmental law, but more needs to be done at all levels. In October 2019, the European Council called upon the Commission to present at the latest by early 2020 an ambitious and focused proposal for the 8 th EAP (2021-2030), and underlined that the new programme must address environmental governance, such as public participation and access to justice. Hopefully, the missing link of EU environmental legislation will be resolved by the EU institutions as soon as possible.
缺失的环节——在环境问题上诉诸司法
人们普遍认为环境保护、社会效益和经济问题必须齐头并进。在欧洲联盟,环境行动计划(eap)自20世纪70年代以来一直指导着欧盟环境政策的发展,并加强了环境目标的实现和环境利益与欧盟其他政策领域的整合。鉴于欧盟的共同责任,欧盟的环境政策为欧盟及其成员国提供了附加价值。到2020年底,第7次环境行动计划将成为商定的环境政策制定框架,目前正在讨论制定第8次环境行动计划。2014年至2020年期间,在实现该规划目标方面取得了一些进展。例如,第七届环境评估方案提高了环境政策的可预测性,并促进了会员国的政策协调。尽管如此,对第7次EAP的评估证明,欧盟立法正朝着正确的方向发展,但实地行动无法看到其影响。欧盟在环境方面取得的成就持续增长,但付诸实施的努力还不够。在国家一级也可以看到连贯执行环境政策的广泛困难。这就是为什么不同的利益相关者(特别是环保非政府组织)在环境政策的制定、实施和执行中发挥决定性作用的主要原因。证据基础表明,公众的参与可以减少欧盟环境法的执行赤字,但需要在各个层面做更多的工作。2019年10月,欧洲理事会呼吁欧盟委员会最迟在2020年初为第八次环境行动计划(2021-2030年)提交一份雄心勃勃、重点突出的提案,并强调新计划必须解决环境治理问题,如公众参与和诉诸司法。希望欧盟机构能够尽快解决欧盟环境立法缺失的环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信