The Efficacy and Acceptance of Brief Intentional Teachings to Encourage Success (BITES)

Scottie Moore
{"title":"The Efficacy and Acceptance of Brief Intentional Teachings to Encourage Success (BITES)","authors":"Scottie Moore","doi":"10.29074/ascls.119.001560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students in Medical Laboratory Sciences occasionally struggle in lecture to acquire the knowledge covered in the objectives. After review of the ASCLS Body of Knowledge, nine clearly-stated objectives in Acid-Base studies were distilled and two BITES were created. These BITES are a form of microlearning, where students take 10-20 minute chunks of time to learn a brief topic. 5 objectives are defined and review questions are asked to stimulate active recall and retrieval. At the end, three questions are asked which require application of the knowledge gained over the previous 10-20 minutes. Three surveys were given to all students at different points in time to assess the efficacy and acceptance of BITES; Post-Lecture (Pre-BITES) Questionnaire (PLQ), Post-BITES Questionnaire (PBQ), and Post-3-month Questionnaire (P3Q). In comparing the PLQ and the PBQ, eight correct answers were recalled more often in the PBQ and three correct answers were recalled more often in the PLQ. All correct answers were recalled more often in the P3Q than the PLQ. The question, “I enjoyed these BITES” was answered 1 “no” and 5 “yes”, and received the following scores; 0-1’s, 0-2’s, 3-3’s, 8-4’s, 11-5’s. The question, “I preferred learning with...” indicated that all students but one preferred BITES over lecture. As we continue to master our craft of teaching, we learn that MLS Students prefer learning with BITES in a traditional lecture-based classroom and that durable learning was accomplished over 3-months with their use. Further studies are required to see if BITES improve student engagement.","PeriodicalId":263458,"journal":{"name":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.119.001560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students in Medical Laboratory Sciences occasionally struggle in lecture to acquire the knowledge covered in the objectives. After review of the ASCLS Body of Knowledge, nine clearly-stated objectives in Acid-Base studies were distilled and two BITES were created. These BITES are a form of microlearning, where students take 10-20 minute chunks of time to learn a brief topic. 5 objectives are defined and review questions are asked to stimulate active recall and retrieval. At the end, three questions are asked which require application of the knowledge gained over the previous 10-20 minutes. Three surveys were given to all students at different points in time to assess the efficacy and acceptance of BITES; Post-Lecture (Pre-BITES) Questionnaire (PLQ), Post-BITES Questionnaire (PBQ), and Post-3-month Questionnaire (P3Q). In comparing the PLQ and the PBQ, eight correct answers were recalled more often in the PBQ and three correct answers were recalled more often in the PLQ. All correct answers were recalled more often in the P3Q than the PLQ. The question, “I enjoyed these BITES” was answered 1 “no” and 5 “yes”, and received the following scores; 0-1’s, 0-2’s, 3-3’s, 8-4’s, 11-5’s. The question, “I preferred learning with...” indicated that all students but one preferred BITES over lecture. As we continue to master our craft of teaching, we learn that MLS Students prefer learning with BITES in a traditional lecture-based classroom and that durable learning was accomplished over 3-months with their use. Further studies are required to see if BITES improve student engagement.
鼓励成功的简短意向性教学(BITES)的有效性和接受度
医学检验科学专业的学生有时会在课堂上努力学习目标所涵盖的知识。在回顾了ASCLS知识体系后,提炼了酸碱研究中九个明确的目标,并创建了两个bite。这些bite是微学习的一种形式,学生花10-20分钟的时间学习一个简短的主题。设定5个目标,并提出复习问题,以刺激主动回忆和检索。最后,会问三个问题,这些问题需要运用之前10-20分钟所学到的知识。在不同的时间点对所有学生进行了三次调查,以评估叮咬的效果和接受程度;讲座后(Pre-BITES)问卷(PLQ)、讲座后问卷(PBQ)和三个月后问卷(P3Q)。在PBQ和PLQ的比较中,PBQ中有8个正确答案被更多地回忆,PLQ中有3个正确答案被更多地回忆。在P3Q中,所有正确答案的回忆次数比在PLQ中要多。在“我喜欢这些叮咬”的问题中,回答了1个“否”和5个“是”,并获得了以下分数:0-1, 0-2, 3-3, 8-4, 11-5。问题是,“我更喜欢和……的问题表明,除了一名学生外,所有学生都更喜欢bite而不是讲课。随着我们不断掌握我们的教学技巧,我们了解到MLS学生更喜欢在传统的以讲座为基础的课堂上学习,并且使用它们可以在3个月内完成持久的学习。需要进一步的研究来确定bite是否能提高学生的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信