Performance of Automation Testing Tools for Android Applications

A. Sinaga, Adi Wibowo P., Ariestoni Silalahi, Nita Yolanda
{"title":"Performance of Automation Testing Tools for Android Applications","authors":"A. Sinaga, Adi Wibowo P., Ariestoni Silalahi, Nita Yolanda","doi":"10.1109/ICITEED.2018.8534756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of mobile application is growing remarkably. Hence, the requirement of testing on mobile application is essential in order to assure that all applications on the market have good quality. Testing on mobile application can be conducted manually or automatically. The automation testing utilizes a testing tool to perform test case execution and verification automatically. The utilization of automation testing can improve the performance of testing. There are various automation testing tools for mobile application with different capabilities and characteristics such as Appium, Robotium, and UI Automator. This paper presents an empirical investigation of the performance comparison of automation testing tools when applied into four Android applications as objects under test. Android is a popular operating system for smartphone with a huge number of applications. The result shows that the tools have their advantages and disadvantages. Detail performance comparison of the three tools is presented in this paper. Based on the experiment result, this paper provides recommendation for the utilization of each of the tools.","PeriodicalId":142523,"journal":{"name":"2018 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 10th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2018.8534756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The number of mobile application is growing remarkably. Hence, the requirement of testing on mobile application is essential in order to assure that all applications on the market have good quality. Testing on mobile application can be conducted manually or automatically. The automation testing utilizes a testing tool to perform test case execution and verification automatically. The utilization of automation testing can improve the performance of testing. There are various automation testing tools for mobile application with different capabilities and characteristics such as Appium, Robotium, and UI Automator. This paper presents an empirical investigation of the performance comparison of automation testing tools when applied into four Android applications as objects under test. Android is a popular operating system for smartphone with a huge number of applications. The result shows that the tools have their advantages and disadvantages. Detail performance comparison of the three tools is presented in this paper. Based on the experiment result, this paper provides recommendation for the utilization of each of the tools.
Android应用程序自动化测试工具的性能
移动应用程序的数量正在显著增长。因此,对移动应用程序进行测试的要求是必不可少的,以确保市场上的所有应用程序都具有良好的质量。移动应用程序的测试可以手动或自动进行。自动化测试利用测试工具自动执行测试用例的执行和验证。自动化测试的使用可以提高测试的性能。针对移动应用程序,有各种各样的自动化测试工具,具有不同的功能和特征,如Appium、Robotium和UI Automator。本文对自动化测试工具作为测试对象应用于四个Android应用程序时的性能比较进行了实证研究。Android是一个流行的智能手机操作系统,拥有大量的应用程序。结果表明,这些工具各有优缺点。本文对这三种工具进行了详细的性能比较。根据实验结果,对各工具的使用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信