Implementation of hybrid chemistry labs as a learning strategy in post-COVID times

A. Sánchez-López, L. M. Lozano-Sánchez, Alejandro Parra-Córdova, J. Castañeda-Sedano, Jackeline Iturbe Ek
{"title":"Implementation of hybrid chemistry labs as a learning strategy in post-COVID times","authors":"A. Sánchez-López, L. M. Lozano-Sánchez, Alejandro Parra-Córdova, J. Castañeda-Sedano, Jackeline Iturbe Ek","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted educational systems worldwide. During confinement educators were forced to make drastic changes in their teaching dynamics, where online resources were used to replace face-to-face activities and interactions. Due to an increase in vaccination rates schools are gradually re-opening, this led to the following question: How can we design and implement a chemistry lab-based course that could incorporate in-person and at-home students simultaneously? The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a hybrid chemistry lab (HL) to a virtual chemistry lab approach (VL) in students learning, engagement, and the development of essential competencies in engineering. The didactic intervention was conducted during the spring semester of 2021, where 220 students from 10 different branches of engineering were assessed. The HL class was divided into 2 groups: students who took the course remotely, and students who attended the laboratory to carry out face-to-face experiments. Four different protocols that consider hands-on experiments were included in both groups. The experiments were modified to be completed at home using simple, non-dangerous, and readily available materials. Results were compared and analyzed in python (v3.8.0), where a p < 0.05 value was considered statistically significant. Results shows that HL groups obtained higher grades and a greater understanding of the material; additionally, the development of competencies improved by 15%. The majority agreed that the course contributed to improve their skills regarding applied chemistry in the lab. Students considered they actively participated in practical work and interacted with people applying class contents. The HL allowed students to achieve competencies sought out for in this chemistry course. The use of hybrid models offers flexibility in the learning process while allowing students to be prepared for future challenges in the post-COVID era.","PeriodicalId":416694,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted educational systems worldwide. During confinement educators were forced to make drastic changes in their teaching dynamics, where online resources were used to replace face-to-face activities and interactions. Due to an increase in vaccination rates schools are gradually re-opening, this led to the following question: How can we design and implement a chemistry lab-based course that could incorporate in-person and at-home students simultaneously? The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a hybrid chemistry lab (HL) to a virtual chemistry lab approach (VL) in students learning, engagement, and the development of essential competencies in engineering. The didactic intervention was conducted during the spring semester of 2021, where 220 students from 10 different branches of engineering were assessed. The HL class was divided into 2 groups: students who took the course remotely, and students who attended the laboratory to carry out face-to-face experiments. Four different protocols that consider hands-on experiments were included in both groups. The experiments were modified to be completed at home using simple, non-dangerous, and readily available materials. Results were compared and analyzed in python (v3.8.0), where a p < 0.05 value was considered statistically significant. Results shows that HL groups obtained higher grades and a greater understanding of the material; additionally, the development of competencies improved by 15%. The majority agreed that the course contributed to improve their skills regarding applied chemistry in the lab. Students considered they actively participated in practical work and interacted with people applying class contents. The HL allowed students to achieve competencies sought out for in this chemistry course. The use of hybrid models offers flexibility in the learning process while allowing students to be prepared for future challenges in the post-COVID era.
在后covid时代,混合化学实验室作为学习策略的实施
2019冠状病毒病大流行严重影响了世界各地的教育系统。在监禁期间,教育工作者被迫对教学动态做出重大改变,使用在线资源取代面对面的活动和互动。由于疫苗接种率的提高,学校逐渐重新开放,这导致了以下问题:我们如何设计和实施一门以化学实验为基础的课程,使面对面和在家的学生同时参与?本研究的目的是比较混合化学实验室(HL)和虚拟化学实验室方法(VL)在学生学习、参与和培养工程基本能力方面的效果。教学干预在2021年春季学期进行,对来自10个不同工程分支的220名学生进行了评估。HL班分为两组:远程上课的学生和到实验室进行面对面实验的学生。两组中都包括了四种考虑动手实验的不同方案。实验经过修改,可以在家中使用简单、无危险和现成的材料完成。结果在python (v3.8.0)中进行比较和分析,其中p < 0.05值被认为具有统计学意义。结果表明:HL组对材料的评价等级较高,对材料的理解程度较高;此外,能力的发展提高了15%。大多数学生认为该课程有助于提高他们在实验室应用化学方面的技能。学生认为他们积极参与实际工作,并与应用课程内容的人进行互动。HL让学生在化学课程中获得所需的能力。混合模式的使用为学习过程提供了灵活性,同时使学生能够为后covid时代的未来挑战做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信