Dualisme Makna Akta Pengakuan Hutang

R. Y. Sinaga
{"title":"Dualisme Makna Akta Pengakuan Hutang","authors":"R. Y. Sinaga","doi":"10.47268/pela.v1i3.7506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Deed of debt recognition as an authentic deed can be made in two forms, namely as a debt agreement or equivalent to a credit agreement and as an assessor agreement of a credit agreement deed that is grosse deed. Both types of debt acknowledgment deeds are still used in public life, the benefits and functions of each deed are different, because the position is different, the impact of the deed is also different.   \nPurposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to see the differences in the actualization of the deed of recognition of debt in practice and to examine the position of the deed of debt recognition and the contribution of each deed in the legal relationship of the parties.   \nMethods of the Research: This research was conducted in a normative juridical manner, namely by examining the existing secondary data in the field of law as library data which is focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law so that the data used by the author is secondary data. \nResults Originality of the Research: The dualism of interpreting the meaning of debt recognition basically has the same hope, namely the existence of a legal relationship in debts and receivables, the position deed of debt recognition as an authentic deed has a formal function and the function of evidence, the strength of the debt recognition deed provides perfect evidentiary power. The position of debt recognition as a grosse deed should not be merely a scrap of paper because it requires a follow-up to the imposition of collateral through a separate deed of guarantee, then the debt recognition as an assessor agreement becomes an intermediary deed which seems futile. The dualism of the meaning of this deed of recognition of debt would not occur again and provide a harmonious understanding. if you really want to emphasize it, you should use the term 'debt agreement or credit agreement' which is domiciled as the main agreement, without a grosse deed followed by the binding of special guarantees, both individual and material guarantees for the interests and legal protection of the parties.","PeriodicalId":251089,"journal":{"name":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i3.7506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Deed of debt recognition as an authentic deed can be made in two forms, namely as a debt agreement or equivalent to a credit agreement and as an assessor agreement of a credit agreement deed that is grosse deed. Both types of debt acknowledgment deeds are still used in public life, the benefits and functions of each deed are different, because the position is different, the impact of the deed is also different.   Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to see the differences in the actualization of the deed of recognition of debt in practice and to examine the position of the deed of debt recognition and the contribution of each deed in the legal relationship of the parties.   Methods of the Research: This research was conducted in a normative juridical manner, namely by examining the existing secondary data in the field of law as library data which is focused on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law so that the data used by the author is secondary data. Results Originality of the Research: The dualism of interpreting the meaning of debt recognition basically has the same hope, namely the existence of a legal relationship in debts and receivables, the position deed of debt recognition as an authentic deed has a formal function and the function of evidence, the strength of the debt recognition deed provides perfect evidentiary power. The position of debt recognition as a grosse deed should not be merely a scrap of paper because it requires a follow-up to the imposition of collateral through a separate deed of guarantee, then the debt recognition as an assessor agreement becomes an intermediary deed which seems futile. The dualism of the meaning of this deed of recognition of debt would not occur again and provide a harmonious understanding. if you really want to emphasize it, you should use the term 'debt agreement or credit agreement' which is domiciled as the main agreement, without a grosse deed followed by the binding of special guarantees, both individual and material guarantees for the interests and legal protection of the parties.
复密性意味着债务证明
引言:债务契据作为一种真实契据可以有两种形式,即作为债务协议或相当于信用协议,以及作为信用协议契据的评估协议,即总契据。这两种类型的债务确认契约仍然在公共生活中使用,每种契约的利益和功能不同,因为位置不同,契约的影响也不同。研究目的:本研究的目的是了解债务承认契约在实践中的实现差异,并考察债务承认契约在当事人法律关系中的地位和各契约的贡献。研究方法:本研究以规范的司法方式进行,即通过检查法律领域现有的二手数据作为图书馆数据,重点是检查成文法中规则或规范的应用,以便作者使用的数据是二手数据。结果研究的独创性:对债务确认意义的二元论解释基本上都有相同的希望,即债务与应收款之间存在法律关系,债务确认的地位契据作为一种真实契据具有形式功能和证据功能,债务确认契据的强度提供了完善的举证力。债务确认作为总契约的地位不应仅仅是一张废纸,因为它需要通过单独的担保契约对抵押品的施加进行后续处理,然后债务确认作为评估人协议成为一种中介契约,似乎是徒劳的。这种承认债务契约意义的二元论将不再发生,并提供一种和谐的理解。如果你真的想强调它,你应该使用“债务协议或信用协议”这一术语,以住所为主要协议,而不是总契约,然后是对当事人的利益和法律保护具有约束力的特别担保,无论是个人担保还是物质担保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信