Nash Equilibrium of Multiple, Non-Uniform Bitcoin Block Withholding Attackers

S. Elliott
{"title":"Nash Equilibrium of Multiple, Non-Uniform Bitcoin Block Withholding Attackers","authors":"S. Elliott","doi":"10.1109/ICDIS.2019.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research analyzes a seemingly malicious behavior known as a block withholding (BWH) attack between pools of cryptocurrency miners in Bitcoin-like systems featuring blockchain distributed databases. This work updates and builds on a seminal paper, The Miner's Dilemma, which studied a simplified scenario and showed that a BWH attack can be rational behavior that is profitable for the attacker. The new research presented here provides an in-depth profit analysis of a more complex and realistic BWH attack scenario, which includes mutual attacks between multiple, non-uniform Bitcoin mining pools. As a result of mathematical analysis and MATLAB modeling, this paper illustrates the Nash equilibrium conditions of a system of independent mining pools with varied mining rates and computes the equilibrium rates of mutual BWH attack. The analysis method quantifies the additional profit the largest pools extract from the system at the expense of the smaller pools. The results indicate that while the presence of BWH is a net negative for smaller pools, they must participate in BWH to maximize their remaining profits, and the results quantify the attack rates the smaller pools must maintain. Also, the smallest pools maximize profit by not attacking at all-that is, retaliation is not a rational move for them.","PeriodicalId":181673,"journal":{"name":"2019 2nd International Conference on Data Intelligence and Security (ICDIS)","volume":"153 6S 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 2nd International Conference on Data Intelligence and Security (ICDIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIS.2019.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This research analyzes a seemingly malicious behavior known as a block withholding (BWH) attack between pools of cryptocurrency miners in Bitcoin-like systems featuring blockchain distributed databases. This work updates and builds on a seminal paper, The Miner's Dilemma, which studied a simplified scenario and showed that a BWH attack can be rational behavior that is profitable for the attacker. The new research presented here provides an in-depth profit analysis of a more complex and realistic BWH attack scenario, which includes mutual attacks between multiple, non-uniform Bitcoin mining pools. As a result of mathematical analysis and MATLAB modeling, this paper illustrates the Nash equilibrium conditions of a system of independent mining pools with varied mining rates and computes the equilibrium rates of mutual BWH attack. The analysis method quantifies the additional profit the largest pools extract from the system at the expense of the smaller pools. The results indicate that while the presence of BWH is a net negative for smaller pools, they must participate in BWH to maximize their remaining profits, and the results quantify the attack rates the smaller pools must maintain. Also, the smallest pools maximize profit by not attacking at all-that is, retaliation is not a rational move for them.
多个非均匀比特币区块扣留攻击者的纳什均衡
本研究分析了一种看似恶意的行为,称为区块扣留(BWH)攻击,发生在以区块链分布式数据库为特征的类比特币系统中的加密货币矿工池之间。这项工作更新并建立在一篇开创性的论文《矿工的困境》(The Miner’s Dilemma)的基础上,该论文研究了一个简化的场景,并表明BWH攻击可能是对攻击者有利的理性行为。本文提出的新研究对更复杂和现实的BWH攻击场景进行了深入的利润分析,其中包括多个非统一比特币矿池之间的相互攻击。通过数学分析和MATLAB建模,给出了不同挖矿率的独立矿池系统的纳什均衡条件,并计算了相互BWH攻击的均衡率。该分析方法量化了最大池以牺牲较小池为代价从系统中提取的额外利润。结果表明,虽然BWH的存在对较小的矿池来说是净负面的,但它们必须参与BWH以最大化其剩余利润,并且结果量化了较小矿池必须保持的攻击率。此外,最小的池通过不攻击来最大化利润,也就是说,报复对他们来说不是一个理性的举动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信