Challenges of Adding Causation to Richer Event Descriptions

EVENTS@ACL Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI:10.3115/v1/W14-2903
Rei Ikuta, Will Styler, Mariah Hamang, Timothy J. O'Gorman, Martha Palmer
{"title":"Challenges of Adding Causation to Richer Event Descriptions","authors":"Rei Ikuta, Will Styler, Mariah Hamang, Timothy J. O'Gorman, Martha Palmer","doi":"10.3115/v1/W14-2903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this study is to create guidelines for annotating cause-effect relations as part of the Richer Event Description schema. We present the challenges faced using the definition of causation in terms of counterfactual dependence and propose new guidelines for cause-effect annotation using an alternative definition which treats causation as an intrinsic relation between events. To support the use of such an intrinsic definition, we examine the theoretical problems that the counterfactual definition faces, show how the intrinsic definition solves those problems, and explain how the intrinsic definition adheres to psychological reality, at least for our annotation purposes, better than the counterfactual definition. We then evaluate the new guidelines by presenting results obtained from pilot annotations of ten documents, showing that an inter-annotator agreement (F1-score) of 0.5753 was achieved. The results provide a benchmark for future studies concerning cause-effect annotation in the RED schema.","PeriodicalId":392223,"journal":{"name":"EVENTS@ACL","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EVENTS@ACL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-2903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

The goal of this study is to create guidelines for annotating cause-effect relations as part of the Richer Event Description schema. We present the challenges faced using the definition of causation in terms of counterfactual dependence and propose new guidelines for cause-effect annotation using an alternative definition which treats causation as an intrinsic relation between events. To support the use of such an intrinsic definition, we examine the theoretical problems that the counterfactual definition faces, show how the intrinsic definition solves those problems, and explain how the intrinsic definition adheres to psychological reality, at least for our annotation purposes, better than the counterfactual definition. We then evaluate the new guidelines by presenting results obtained from pilot annotations of ten documents, showing that an inter-annotator agreement (F1-score) of 0.5753 was achieved. The results provide a benchmark for future studies concerning cause-effect annotation in the RED schema.
在更丰富的事件描述中添加因果关系的挑战
本研究的目的是建立因果关系注解指南,作为丰富事件描述模式的一部分。我们提出了在反事实依赖方面使用因果关系定义所面临的挑战,并提出了使用将因果关系视为事件之间内在关系的替代定义的因果注释的新指导方针。为了支持这种内在定义的使用,我们研究了反事实定义面临的理论问题,展示了内在定义如何解决这些问题,并解释了内在定义如何坚持心理现实,至少对于我们的注释目的来说,比反事实定义更好。然后,我们通过展示从10个文档的试点注释中获得的结果来评估新指南,结果显示注释者之间的一致性(f1分数)达到了0.5753。研究结果为进一步研究RED图式的因果标注提供了参考依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信