The necessity of data allocation: A plea for a private law (property law) perspective

F. Szilágyi
{"title":"The necessity of data allocation: A plea for a private law (property law) perspective","authors":"F. Szilágyi","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Clarifying the legal status of data is one of the major issues and challenges the European legislator has to deal and cope with while establishing a legal frame for a European data economy. Albeit at the beginning of the policy-making process the idea of creating a data right (on non-personal data) was on the agenda of the European Commission, this idea now seems to be have been abandoned. Instead, the focus actually lies on the creation of access and management regimes (e.g. Open Data Directive, Proposal for a European Data Governance Act). This approach seems, from a private law perspective, questionable, since the access right is inherently connected to – or more precisely, flowing from – an allocative right (in its most classical form: ownership). This article is a plea for a private law, or more precisely, property law perspective, namely for the creation of an allocative data right. It explores why the access approach from a private law perspective appears to be inconsistent and outlines the contours of such allocative right. In this context, contemporary property law theories are also assessed, since it is primarily property law which shall serve as the doctrinal background and framework for the envisaged allocative data right.","PeriodicalId":338086,"journal":{"name":"European Property Law Journal","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Clarifying the legal status of data is one of the major issues and challenges the European legislator has to deal and cope with while establishing a legal frame for a European data economy. Albeit at the beginning of the policy-making process the idea of creating a data right (on non-personal data) was on the agenda of the European Commission, this idea now seems to be have been abandoned. Instead, the focus actually lies on the creation of access and management regimes (e.g. Open Data Directive, Proposal for a European Data Governance Act). This approach seems, from a private law perspective, questionable, since the access right is inherently connected to – or more precisely, flowing from – an allocative right (in its most classical form: ownership). This article is a plea for a private law, or more precisely, property law perspective, namely for the creation of an allocative data right. It explores why the access approach from a private law perspective appears to be inconsistent and outlines the contours of such allocative right. In this context, contemporary property law theories are also assessed, since it is primarily property law which shall serve as the doctrinal background and framework for the envisaged allocative data right.
数据分配的必要性:对私法(物权法)视角的辩护
明确数据的法律地位是欧洲立法者在为欧洲数据经济建立法律框架时必须处理和应对的主要问题和挑战之一。尽管在政策制定过程的开始,创建数据权(非个人数据)的想法被提上了欧盟委员会的议程,但现在这个想法似乎已经被放弃了。相反,重点实际上在于创建访问和管理制度(例如开放数据指令,欧洲数据治理法案提案)。从私法的角度来看,这种方法似乎是有问题的,因为获取权与一种配置权(以其最经典的形式:所有权)内在地联系在一起,或者更准确地说,是从这种配置权中流出来的。本文从私法的角度,或者更准确地说,从物权法的角度,即为创建一种可配置的数据权而提出请求。它探讨了为什么从私法的角度来看,获取途径似乎是不一致的,并概述了这种配置权利的轮廓。在此背景下,也对当代物权法理论进行了评估,因为主要是物权法将作为设想的配置数据权的理论背景和框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信