Russian and Central Asian Views on China’s Belt & Road Initiative

Ulaş Başar Gezgin
{"title":"Russian and Central Asian Views on China’s Belt & Road Initiative","authors":"Ulaş Başar Gezgin","doi":"10.31454/usb.722094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we review and discuss Russian and Central Asian views on China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). BRI is considered to be a panacea for multiple problems of China such as the Xinjiang issue, economic slowdown, excess capacity etc. In this context, Chinese principle of non-interference is increasingly questioned as it is hard to separate economical, geopolitical and security dimensions. Russian influence over Central Asia is expected to wane due to BRI projects which may cause Sino- Russian conflicts. On the other hand, Russian isolation after the Ukrainian crisis makes Russia to consider BRI in amicable terms. Central Asian official views on BRI are mostly positive, although local peoples’ objections involving social and environmental impacts are noteworthy. Since the region is landlocked, the prospects are high. However, rather than earning transit revenues only, the regional states are in expectation of Chinese investments in other business areas. Central Asia is far from the goal of regional integration. Border disputes, water scarcity, intra-regional mistrust etc. are divisive enough to prevent the region to act in a coordinated manner with regard to BRI. China, on this occasion, appears to be the major force to integrate the region.","PeriodicalId":170890,"journal":{"name":"Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"41 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31454/usb.722094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we review and discuss Russian and Central Asian views on China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). BRI is considered to be a panacea for multiple problems of China such as the Xinjiang issue, economic slowdown, excess capacity etc. In this context, Chinese principle of non-interference is increasingly questioned as it is hard to separate economical, geopolitical and security dimensions. Russian influence over Central Asia is expected to wane due to BRI projects which may cause Sino- Russian conflicts. On the other hand, Russian isolation after the Ukrainian crisis makes Russia to consider BRI in amicable terms. Central Asian official views on BRI are mostly positive, although local peoples’ objections involving social and environmental impacts are noteworthy. Since the region is landlocked, the prospects are high. However, rather than earning transit revenues only, the regional states are in expectation of Chinese investments in other business areas. Central Asia is far from the goal of regional integration. Border disputes, water scarcity, intra-regional mistrust etc. are divisive enough to prevent the region to act in a coordinated manner with regard to BRI. China, on this occasion, appears to be the major force to integrate the region.
俄罗斯和中亚国家对中国“一带一路”倡议的看法
在本文中,我们回顾并讨论了俄罗斯和中亚对中国“一带一路”倡议的看法。“一带一路”被认为是解决中国新疆问题、经济放缓、产能过剩等多重问题的灵丹妙药。在这种背景下,中国的不干涉原则越来越受到质疑,因为很难将经济、地缘政治和安全维度分开。由于一带一路项目可能导致中俄冲突,俄罗斯对中亚的影响力预计会减弱。另一方面,俄罗斯在乌克兰危机后被孤立,这使得俄罗斯以友好的方式考虑“一带一路”。中亚官方对“一带一路”的看法大多是积极的,尽管当地人民对社会和环境影响的反对意见值得注意。由于该地区是内陆地区,前景很好。然而,这些地区的国家不仅希望获得过境收入,还希望中国在其他商业领域进行投资。中亚离区域一体化的目标还很远。边界争端、水资源短缺、地区内不信任等足以造成分歧,阻碍该地区在“一带一路”上采取协调一致的行动。在这种情况下,中国似乎是整合该地区的主要力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信