EVENTS ON THE RIVER SIT’ (1238) IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RUSSIAN RULERS’ BEHAVIOR DURING THE INVASION OF BATU KHAN

V. N. Rudakov
{"title":"EVENTS ON THE RIVER SIT’ (1238) IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RUSSIAN RULERS’ BEHAVIOR DURING THE INVASION OF BATU KHAN","authors":"V. N. Rudakov","doi":"10.55959/msu0130-0083-8-2023-1-3-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th e article examines the actions of grand prince Yuri Vsevolodo-vich of Vladimir on the river Sit’ and their descriptions in the early narrative of the chronicles about the invasion of Batu Khan. Th e aim of the study is to recon-struct the historical context in which prince Yuri and other rulers of Russian lands acted during the events of 1237–1241, and to reveal the attitude of the authors of chronicles and hagiographic works of the late 13th and early 14th centuries to the princes’ fl ight from the Tartars. Th e scholarly novelty of the research consists in the complex use of statistical and axiological methods. Th e author concludes that almost half of total number of Russian princes (18 out of 37) mentioned in the early narrative of the chronicles about the invasion either defi nitely escaped from the Tatars, or did so with a high probability. Th is allows us to believe the interpre-tation in the older version of the Novgorod First Chronicle, according to which Yuri Vsevolodovich also escaped from the Tatars and thus ended up on the River Sit’, where he was killed. Most likely, the princes’ fl ight itself was not a compromising circumstance in the eyes of their nearest descendants. Quite the contrary, the suc-cessful escape was perceived as God’s intercession and was extolled in every pos-sible way. However, Yuri’s case was special: unlike the overwhelming majority of princes who fl ed, he perished. As a result, the author of the Laurentian Chronicle, who set out to write a eulogy to the grand prince, had to create a rather contradic-tory picture of events, according to which Yuri Vsevolodovich allegedly was not going to escape, but, on the contrary, he was preparing to withstand the enemy on the river Sit’. And he revealed himself not as an experienced and courageous warrior, but as a martyr who, like saints Boris and Gleb, was ready for sacrifi cial slaughter and, like “new Job”, to meekly face the trials that came upon him.","PeriodicalId":299303,"journal":{"name":"LOMONOSOV HISTORY JOURNAL","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LOMONOSOV HISTORY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0130-0083-8-2023-1-3-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Th e article examines the actions of grand prince Yuri Vsevolodo-vich of Vladimir on the river Sit’ and their descriptions in the early narrative of the chronicles about the invasion of Batu Khan. Th e aim of the study is to recon-struct the historical context in which prince Yuri and other rulers of Russian lands acted during the events of 1237–1241, and to reveal the attitude of the authors of chronicles and hagiographic works of the late 13th and early 14th centuries to the princes’ fl ight from the Tartars. Th e scholarly novelty of the research consists in the complex use of statistical and axiological methods. Th e author concludes that almost half of total number of Russian princes (18 out of 37) mentioned in the early narrative of the chronicles about the invasion either defi nitely escaped from the Tatars, or did so with a high probability. Th is allows us to believe the interpre-tation in the older version of the Novgorod First Chronicle, according to which Yuri Vsevolodovich also escaped from the Tatars and thus ended up on the River Sit’, where he was killed. Most likely, the princes’ fl ight itself was not a compromising circumstance in the eyes of their nearest descendants. Quite the contrary, the suc-cessful escape was perceived as God’s intercession and was extolled in every pos-sible way. However, Yuri’s case was special: unlike the overwhelming majority of princes who fl ed, he perished. As a result, the author of the Laurentian Chronicle, who set out to write a eulogy to the grand prince, had to create a rather contradic-tory picture of events, according to which Yuri Vsevolodovich allegedly was not going to escape, but, on the contrary, he was preparing to withstand the enemy on the river Sit’. And he revealed himself not as an experienced and courageous warrior, but as a martyr who, like saints Boris and Gleb, was ready for sacrifi cial slaughter and, like “new Job”, to meekly face the trials that came upon him.
河上的事件(1238)是在俄罗斯统治者入侵巴都汗时的行为背景下发生的
本文考察了弗拉基米尔大公尤里·维塞沃洛多维奇(Yuri Vsevolodo-vich)在锡特河上的行动,以及他们在早期编年史中对Batu Khan入侵的描述。这项研究的目的是重建尤里王子和其他俄罗斯土地统治者在1237-1241年事件中的历史背景,并揭示13世纪末和14世纪初编年史和圣徒作品的作者对王子逃离鞑靼人的态度。这项研究的学术新颖性在于统计和价值论方法的复杂使用。作者的结论是,在关于入侵的编年史的早期叙述中提到的俄罗斯王子总数中,几乎有一半(37人中有18人)从鞑靼人手中逃脱了,或者很有可能逃脱了。这让我们相信旧版的《诺夫哥罗德第一编年史》中的解释,根据这一解释,尤里·弗塞沃洛多维奇也从鞑靼人手中逃了出来,最终逃到了西特河,并在那里被杀。最有可能的是,在他们最近的后代眼中,王子的逃亡本身并不是一种妥协的情况。恰恰相反,成功的逃脱被认为是上帝的代祷,并以各种可能的方式受到赞美。然而,尤里的情况很特别:与绝大多数逃离的王子不同,他死了。因此,《劳伦森编年史》的作者,本来打算给大公写悼词的,却不得不编造出一幅矛盾的画面,据说尤里·维塞沃洛多维奇并没有逃跑,相反,他准备在锡特河上抵抗敌人。他并不是一个经验丰富、勇敢无畏的战士,而是一个殉道者,像圣人鲍里斯和格列布一样,随时准备接受牺牲的屠杀,像“新约伯”一样,温顺地面对降临在他身上的考验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信