Real Earnings Management and Dividend Payout Signals: A Study for U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts

R. Edelstein, Peng Liu, Desmond Tsang
{"title":"Real Earnings Management and Dividend Payout Signals: A Study for U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts","authors":"R. Edelstein, Peng Liu, Desmond Tsang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1079984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts are required by federal law to distribute 90% of taxable income as dividends to common shareholders. We examine if firms subject to a binding dividend constraint, engage in real earnings management (REM) to reduce taxable income to meet dividend requirements. Since taxable income typically is not publicly reported by REIT's, we use dividend payout ratios based on FFO, a voluntary measure commonly used by the REIT industry, and net income, a measure required by GAAP, to serve as signals for the unobserved dividend-to-taxable income ratio. Using the dividend-to-FFO ratio to identify firms that may confront difficulties meeting dividend requirements, we find that these firms are more likely to participate in REM activities by reducing revenue and increasing expenses; both actions of which would reduce taxable income. We also provide evidence that firms generating less cash flow from operations and having fewer opportunities to obtain funding from the general capital markets are more likely to employ REM by selling fixed assets at a loss to generate the necessary cash flow for dividend payments, as well as to alter the dividend payment requirements. Overall, our findings suggest REM is a viable strategy that REIT managers utilize to meet regulatory dividend constraints. Managers are more likely to choose REM when there are limited alternative funding sources. We find that average returns in the three years following reduced income through REM are substantially positive, implying investors may not fully realize that current income reduction created by REM activities.","PeriodicalId":437258,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","volume":"362 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1079984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts are required by federal law to distribute 90% of taxable income as dividends to common shareholders. We examine if firms subject to a binding dividend constraint, engage in real earnings management (REM) to reduce taxable income to meet dividend requirements. Since taxable income typically is not publicly reported by REIT's, we use dividend payout ratios based on FFO, a voluntary measure commonly used by the REIT industry, and net income, a measure required by GAAP, to serve as signals for the unobserved dividend-to-taxable income ratio. Using the dividend-to-FFO ratio to identify firms that may confront difficulties meeting dividend requirements, we find that these firms are more likely to participate in REM activities by reducing revenue and increasing expenses; both actions of which would reduce taxable income. We also provide evidence that firms generating less cash flow from operations and having fewer opportunities to obtain funding from the general capital markets are more likely to employ REM by selling fixed assets at a loss to generate the necessary cash flow for dividend payments, as well as to alter the dividend payment requirements. Overall, our findings suggest REM is a viable strategy that REIT managers utilize to meet regulatory dividend constraints. Managers are more likely to choose REM when there are limited alternative funding sources. We find that average returns in the three years following reduced income through REM are substantially positive, implying investors may not fully realize that current income reduction created by REM activities.
真实盈余管理与股利支付信号:美国房地产投资信托基金研究
根据联邦法律,美国房地产投资信托基金必须将应税收入的90%作为股息分配给普通股股东。我们研究了公司是否受到具有约束力的股息约束,从事实际盈余管理(REM),以减少应税收入,以满足股息的要求。由于REIT通常不公开报告应税收入,我们使用基于FFO的股息支付比率,这是REIT行业常用的一种自愿衡量标准,以及GAAP要求的净收入,作为未观察到的股息与应税收入比率的信号。利用股利对财务净盈余比率来识别可能难以满足股利要求的公司,我们发现这些公司更有可能通过减少收入和增加费用来参与REM活动;这两项措施都将减少应税收入。我们还提供证据表明,从运营中产生较少现金流且从一般资本市场获得资金的机会较少的公司更有可能通过亏损出售固定资产来使用REM,以产生支付股息所需的现金流,并改变股息支付要求。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明REM是REIT经理用来满足监管股息约束的可行策略。当可供选择的资金来源有限时,管理者更有可能选择REM。我们发现,通过REM减少收入后的三年平均回报基本上是正的,这意味着投资者可能没有充分意识到REM活动造成的当前收入减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信