Factors influencing the adoption and use of open access scholarly communication among researchers in India

Mohammad Nazim, Mohammad Ashar
{"title":"Factors influencing the adoption and use of open access scholarly communication among researchers in India","authors":"Mohammad Nazim, Mohammad Ashar","doi":"10.1108/oir-05-2021-0265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe present study aims to examine the use of open access (OA) scholarly communication in India and investigate the factors affecting the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication among researchers.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted a quantitative research approach using a survey method. Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) of Web of Science database was selected as a source for identifying potential researchers and researchers' contact details. A web-based questionnaire was designed using Google Forms, and a link to the questionnaire was sent by email to 4,237 researchers belonging to Science and Technology. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) is the primary basis for formulating the present study's conceptual model. Hierarchical multiple regression (HMR) was applied for identifying the factors that influence the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication.FindingsThe study found that researchers have limited knowledge of different OA concepts, initiatives and resources, resulting in a deficient level of participation in OA publishing. The HMR analysis authenticates that attitude, facilitating conditions, Internet usage self-efficacy, article processing charge (APC) and researchers' working experience significantly influence the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication. Based on the findings, the study proposed a validated model to investigate the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication in different institutions, research disciplines and developing countries with similar conditions.Practical implicationsThe findings have several practical and policy implications for improving OA publishing in India, formulating OA policies and providing directions for further research.Originality/valueThis is the first study focusing on adopting and using OA scholarly communication in India. Findings may be helpful in planning and implementing OA initiatives. The influencing factors and the relative importance identified in the present study offered empirical evidence to demonstrate the researchers' attitudes and perceptions for adopting and using OA scholarly communication.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0265.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-05-2021-0265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe present study aims to examine the use of open access (OA) scholarly communication in India and investigate the factors affecting the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication among researchers.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted a quantitative research approach using a survey method. Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) of Web of Science database was selected as a source for identifying potential researchers and researchers' contact details. A web-based questionnaire was designed using Google Forms, and a link to the questionnaire was sent by email to 4,237 researchers belonging to Science and Technology. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) is the primary basis for formulating the present study's conceptual model. Hierarchical multiple regression (HMR) was applied for identifying the factors that influence the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication.FindingsThe study found that researchers have limited knowledge of different OA concepts, initiatives and resources, resulting in a deficient level of participation in OA publishing. The HMR analysis authenticates that attitude, facilitating conditions, Internet usage self-efficacy, article processing charge (APC) and researchers' working experience significantly influence the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication. Based on the findings, the study proposed a validated model to investigate the adoption and use of OA scholarly communication in different institutions, research disciplines and developing countries with similar conditions.Practical implicationsThe findings have several practical and policy implications for improving OA publishing in India, formulating OA policies and providing directions for further research.Originality/valueThis is the first study focusing on adopting and using OA scholarly communication in India. Findings may be helpful in planning and implementing OA initiatives. The influencing factors and the relative importance identified in the present study offered empirical evidence to demonstrate the researchers' attitudes and perceptions for adopting and using OA scholarly communication.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0265.
影响印度研究人员采用和使用开放获取学术交流的因素
目的本研究旨在调查开放获取学术交流在印度的使用情况,并调查影响开放获取学术交流在研究人员中采用和使用的因素。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了定量研究的方法,采用了调查法。选取Web of Science数据库的SCI-EXPANDED (Science Citation Index Expanded)作为识别潜在研究人员和研究人员联系方式的来源。利用b谷歌Forms设计了一份基于网络的调查问卷,并将调查问卷的链接通过电子邮件发送给4237名科学与技术研究人员。技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)是形成本研究概念模型的主要基础。运用层次多元回归(HMR)分析影响OA学术交流采用和使用的因素。研究发现,科研人员对不同的OA概念、倡议和资源的了解有限,导致OA出版的参与水平不足。HMR分析证实态度、便利条件、网络使用自我效能感、文章处理费(APC)和研究者工作经验显著影响OA学术传播的采用和使用。在此基础上,本研究提出了一个经过验证的模型,用于调查不同机构、研究学科和条件相似的发展中国家对OA学术交流的采用和使用情况。研究结果对改善印度开放获取出版、制定开放获取政策以及为进一步研究提供方向具有若干实际和政策意义。原创性/价值这是印度第一个专注于采用和使用OA学术传播的研究。研究结果可能有助于规划和实施OA倡议。本研究确定的影响因素及其相对重要性提供了实证证据,证明了研究者对采用和使用OA学术传播的态度和看法。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0265。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信