Propagation Channel Characterization of 28 GHz and 36 GHz Millimeter-Waves for 5G Cellular Networks

S. Zafar, S. Saleem
{"title":"Propagation Channel Characterization of 28 GHz and 36 GHz Millimeter-Waves for 5G Cellular Networks","authors":"S. Zafar, S. Saleem","doi":"10.1109/ETECTE55893.2022.10007312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in 5G wireless technologies calls for larger bandwidth, which motivates design engineers and researchers to explore a higher frequency spectrum than the existing one spectrum of below 6 GHz. Millimeter-wave (mm-Wave) is viewed as the most suitable spectrum to satisfy the constraints for 5G and beyond cellular systems. However, it is observed that enabling mm-Wave can bring several issues like path loss, fading, scattering, coverage inadequacy, penetration loss, and signal attenuation problems. Therefore, augmenting the propagation path is important to indicate the behavior of the wireless channel prior to its deployment in the real-world environment. For this reason, we aim to analyze the two most promising mm-Wave frequency bands; 28 GHz and 36 GHz. We have selected the most popular Close-In (CI) & Floating-Intercept (FI) propagation path loss models that helped us to design an urban microcell line of sight (LOS) scenario. Finally, the overall network performance has been investigated by evaluating average user throughput, average cell throughput, cell-edge user throughput, peak user throughput, and spectral capacity. Our results show that the CI model performs much better than the FI model due to its high accuracy, simplicity of implementation, robustness, and single-factor dependency.","PeriodicalId":131572,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Control, and Telecommunication Engineering (ETECTE)","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Control, and Telecommunication Engineering (ETECTE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETECTE55893.2022.10007312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in 5G wireless technologies calls for larger bandwidth, which motivates design engineers and researchers to explore a higher frequency spectrum than the existing one spectrum of below 6 GHz. Millimeter-wave (mm-Wave) is viewed as the most suitable spectrum to satisfy the constraints for 5G and beyond cellular systems. However, it is observed that enabling mm-Wave can bring several issues like path loss, fading, scattering, coverage inadequacy, penetration loss, and signal attenuation problems. Therefore, augmenting the propagation path is important to indicate the behavior of the wireless channel prior to its deployment in the real-world environment. For this reason, we aim to analyze the two most promising mm-Wave frequency bands; 28 GHz and 36 GHz. We have selected the most popular Close-In (CI) & Floating-Intercept (FI) propagation path loss models that helped us to design an urban microcell line of sight (LOS) scenario. Finally, the overall network performance has been investigated by evaluating average user throughput, average cell throughput, cell-edge user throughput, peak user throughput, and spectral capacity. Our results show that the CI model performs much better than the FI model due to its high accuracy, simplicity of implementation, robustness, and single-factor dependency.
5G蜂窝网络中28ghz和36ghz毫米波的传播信道特性
5G无线技术的最新进展要求更大的带宽,这促使设计工程师和研究人员探索比现有的6ghz以下频谱更高的频谱。毫米波(mm-Wave)被认为是最适合满足5G及以后蜂窝系统限制的频谱。然而,观察到启用毫米波会带来一些问题,如路径损耗、衰落、散射、覆盖不足、穿透损耗和信号衰减问题。因此,增加传播路径对于在实际环境中部署无线信道之前指示其行为非常重要。因此,我们的目标是分析两个最有前途的毫米波频段;28ghz和36ghz。我们选择了最流行的近距离(CI)和浮动拦截(FI)传播路径损失模型,这些模型帮助我们设计了城市微蜂窝视线(LOS)场景。最后,通过评估平均用户吞吐量、平均小区吞吐量、小区边缘用户吞吐量、峰值用户吞吐量和频谱容量来研究整体网络性能。我们的研究结果表明,CI模型由于其高精度、实现简单、鲁棒性和单因素依赖性而比FI模型表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信