Analysis of Interpretable Handwriting Features to Evaluate Motoric Patterns in Different Neurodegenerative Diseases

D. D. Kairamkonda, P. S. Mandaleeka, A. Favaro, C. Motley, A. Butala, E. Oh, R. Stevens, N. Dehak, L. Moro-Velázquez
{"title":"Analysis of Interpretable Handwriting Features to Evaluate Motoric Patterns in Different Neurodegenerative Diseases","authors":"D. D. Kairamkonda, P. S. Mandaleeka, A. Favaro, C. Motley, A. Butala, E. Oh, R. Stevens, N. Dehak, L. Moro-Velázquez","doi":"10.1109/SPMB55497.2022.10014966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinicians currently use handwriting as one of the methods to establish the presence and monitor the progression of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). While common handwriting evaluation methods are valuable means to detect fine motor and cognitive impairments associated with NDs, these are observer-dependent and subjective. In the present study, we analyzed a broad array of interpretable features, some proposed for the first time in this study, obtained from online handwriting data of participants with NDs and control subjects (CTRL). ND participants have Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), or Parkinson's disease mimics (PDM). Hand-writing data from three different neuropsychological tasks was used: Copy Text task, Copy Cube task, and Copy Image task. Then, we arranged three complementary sets of features and conducted a statistical analysis to test their significance between groups. Overall results suggested that subjects with AD reported a significantly higher $(p < 0.05)$ amount of data points and total duration with respect to the CTRL group in almost all the tasks under assessment. On the other hand, subjects with PD showed a significantly lower $(p < 0.05)$ horizontal width (both on tablet and in the air). Even though the AD and PDM groups showed a significantly lower velocity and acceleration $(p < 0.05)$, their number of inversions in velocity and acceleration was significantly greater $(p < 0.05)$, which indicates disfluency in writing. The features that we have used were found to provide good results in differentiating the studied groups and could be considered as part of diagnostic tools for the assessment and monitoring of NDs in clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":261445,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB55497.2022.10014966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinicians currently use handwriting as one of the methods to establish the presence and monitor the progression of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). While common handwriting evaluation methods are valuable means to detect fine motor and cognitive impairments associated with NDs, these are observer-dependent and subjective. In the present study, we analyzed a broad array of interpretable features, some proposed for the first time in this study, obtained from online handwriting data of participants with NDs and control subjects (CTRL). ND participants have Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), or Parkinson's disease mimics (PDM). Hand-writing data from three different neuropsychological tasks was used: Copy Text task, Copy Cube task, and Copy Image task. Then, we arranged three complementary sets of features and conducted a statistical analysis to test their significance between groups. Overall results suggested that subjects with AD reported a significantly higher $(p < 0.05)$ amount of data points and total duration with respect to the CTRL group in almost all the tasks under assessment. On the other hand, subjects with PD showed a significantly lower $(p < 0.05)$ horizontal width (both on tablet and in the air). Even though the AD and PDM groups showed a significantly lower velocity and acceleration $(p < 0.05)$, their number of inversions in velocity and acceleration was significantly greater $(p < 0.05)$, which indicates disfluency in writing. The features that we have used were found to provide good results in differentiating the studied groups and could be considered as part of diagnostic tools for the assessment and monitoring of NDs in clinical trials.
不同神经退行性疾病运动模式的可解释笔迹特征分析
临床医生目前使用笔迹作为方法之一,以建立存在和监测神经退行性疾病(NDs)的进展。虽然常见的笔迹评估方法是检测与NDs相关的精细运动和认知障碍的有价值的手段,但这些方法依赖于观察者和主观。在本研究中,我们分析了一系列广泛的可解释特征,其中一些特征是本研究首次提出的,这些特征来自NDs参与者和对照受试者(CTRL)的在线手写数据。ND参与者患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)、帕金森氏病(PD)或帕金森氏病模拟(PDM)。研究人员使用了三种不同神经心理学任务的手写数据:复制文本任务、复制立方体任务和复制图像任务。然后,我们安排了三个互补的特征集,并进行了统计分析,以检验其组间显著性。总体结果表明,与对照组相比,AD组在几乎所有评估任务中报告的数据点数量和总持续时间显著增加(p < 0.05)。另一方面,PD受试者在平板电脑和空气中显示显著降低的水平宽度(p < 0.05)。尽管AD组和PDM组的速度和加速度$显著降低(p < 0.05)$,但其速度和加速度反转次数$显著增加(p < 0.05)$,这表明写作不流畅。我们使用的特征在区分研究群体方面提供了良好的结果,可以被认为是临床试验中评估和监测NDs的诊断工具的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信