ANALISIS PENGARUH VARIAN MODEL PROPAGASI TERHADAP KOMUNIKASI DATA PADA PROTOKOL ROUTING TORA, MDART DAN ZRP DI JARINGAN VANET (STUDI KASUS PETA JALAN KOTA PRAYA DAN BYPASS LOMBOK)

Priya Tama Sugara, Andy Hidayat Jatmika, Ariyan Zubaidi
{"title":"ANALISIS PENGARUH VARIAN MODEL PROPAGASI TERHADAP KOMUNIKASI DATA PADA PROTOKOL ROUTING TORA, MDART DAN ZRP DI JARINGAN VANET (STUDI KASUS PETA JALAN KOTA PRAYA DAN BYPASS LOMBOK)","authors":"Priya Tama Sugara, Andy Hidayat Jatmika, Ariyan Zubaidi","doi":"10.29303/jtika.v2i1.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"VANET is part of the Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET), but the nodes on VANET have a higher level of mobility. Each node that moves will cause network activity (topology changes) such as route search and message sending handled by each node. So that each node must have a routing protocol to facilitate communication in the network. The selection of the appropriate routing protocol is needed in urban and  rural scenarios.This study aims to determine the effect of propagation model variants on data communication on the TORA, MDART and ZRP routing protocols on the VANET network on the Praya City and Bypass Lombok road maps with an area of ​​1000x1000 m2. For the variation of the routing protocol using four variations of the propagation model, namely the freespace propagation model, tworayground, shadowing, and nakagami. The number of nodes used in the Praya City road map is 35, 55, 70 nodes and in Lombok Bypass 25, 40, 60 nodes. The test parameters used are throughput, packet delivery ratio and end to end delay.In an urban scenario with an area of ​​1000x1000 m2, the TORA protocol gets a very good throughput parameter on nakagami propagation of 40.95 Kbps and on the ZRP protocol the value of the freespace propagation parameter PDR is 100%. While in the rural scenario a good value is obtained in freespace propagation is  4.82 second. \nKeywords: VANET, Routing Protocol, Propagation, NS2","PeriodicalId":197519,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, Komputer, dan Aplikasinya (JTIKA )","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, Komputer, dan Aplikasinya (JTIKA )","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jtika.v2i1.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

VANET is part of the Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET), but the nodes on VANET have a higher level of mobility. Each node that moves will cause network activity (topology changes) such as route search and message sending handled by each node. So that each node must have a routing protocol to facilitate communication in the network. The selection of the appropriate routing protocol is needed in urban and  rural scenarios.This study aims to determine the effect of propagation model variants on data communication on the TORA, MDART and ZRP routing protocols on the VANET network on the Praya City and Bypass Lombok road maps with an area of ​​1000x1000 m2. For the variation of the routing protocol using four variations of the propagation model, namely the freespace propagation model, tworayground, shadowing, and nakagami. The number of nodes used in the Praya City road map is 35, 55, 70 nodes and in Lombok Bypass 25, 40, 60 nodes. The test parameters used are throughput, packet delivery ratio and end to end delay.In an urban scenario with an area of ​​1000x1000 m2, the TORA protocol gets a very good throughput parameter on nakagami propagation of 40.95 Kbps and on the ZRP protocol the value of the freespace propagation parameter PDR is 100%. While in the rural scenario a good value is obtained in freespace propagation is  4.82 second. Keywords: VANET, Routing Protocol, Propagation, NS2
分析万尼网络中托拉、MDART和ZRP中数据传输模式变体对通信的影响(PRAYA city street map和龙目岛旁路调查案例)
VANET是移动自组织网络(MANET)的一部分,但VANET上的节点具有更高的移动性。每个移动的节点都会引起网络活动(拓扑变化),例如路由搜索和每个节点处理的消息发送。因此,每个节点必须有一个路由协议,以方便网络中的通信。在城市和农村场景中,都需要选择合适的路由协议。本研究旨在确定VANET网络上TORA, MDART和ZRP路由协议的传播模型变体对数据通信的影响,该网络在Praya City和Bypass Lombok道路地图上的面积为1000x1000 m2。对于路由协议的变化,使用四种变化的传播模型,即自由空间传播模型,twayground,阴影和nakagami。普拉亚市路线图中使用的节点数量是35、55、70个节点,龙目岛绕道使用的节点数量是25、40、60个节点。使用的测试参数是吞吐量、分组传送率和端到端延迟。在1000x1000m2的城市场景中,TORA协议在nakagami传播上获得了40.95 Kbps的非常好的吞吐量参数,在ZRP协议上,自由空间传播参数PDR的值为100%。而在农村场景中,在自由空间中获得的良好值为4.82秒。关键词:VANET,路由协议,传播,NS2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信