Whether the Policy Mix in the Brexit Process Is a Simple Accumulation of Short-Term Temporary Decisions or a Series of Long-Term Careful Considerations: A New Framework for Macroeconomic Policy Assessment

Liyang Tang
{"title":"Whether the Policy Mix in the Brexit Process Is a Simple Accumulation of Short-Term Temporary Decisions or a Series of Long-Term Careful Considerations: A New Framework for Macroeconomic Policy Assessment","authors":"Liyang Tang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3554559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies and policymaker remarks suggest that whether the policy mix in a great crisis or a big event is a simple accumulation of short-term temporary decisions or a series of long-term careful considerations could even lead the great crisis or the big event in completely different directions under government intervention. The UK-EU Membership Referendum in Jun-2016 which has officially kicked off the Brexit process and been considered as one of the biggest events in the world economy and politics makes the above theoretical and practical themes on policy mix return to the forefront amid concerns. This study first builds two diagram frameworks on the basis of improved Mundell Assignment Rule and modified Swan Model to help define the theoretical optimal policy path as the comparison standard for empirically assessing various types of policy mix in the Brexit process, subsequently the searching of the unique theoretical optimal policy path with the least distance from the actual evolution path driven by policy mix is converted into a classical primal-dual optimization problem, which can be solved through the collaboration of the GRG (abbreviation for generalized reduced gradient) nonlinear algorithm and the evolutionary algorithm. The assessment results can be generally described as only “expenditure-changing policies minus external balance related components of monetary policies” and “mix of expenditure-changing policies and expenditure-switching policies” during the Brexit process are assessed to be more like a series of long-term careful considerations, while fiscal policies, monetary policies, expenditure-changing policies (as mix of fiscal policies and monetary policies), expenditure-switching policies plus external balance related components of monetary policies, internal balance related overall policy mix, external balance related overall policy mix, and overall policy mix during the Brexit process could only be evaluated to be more like a simple accumulation of short-term temporary decisions. However, these assessment results are sensitive to specific rules set by specific scenarios, assessment results under either the scenario “limited-size backward step allowed” or the scenario “backward step allowed but punished” are significantly better than those under the above original scenario “only step in the target direction allowed”, while assessment results under the scenario “different target directions for different periods” are only slightly better than those under the above original scenario.","PeriodicalId":244949,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3554559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies and policymaker remarks suggest that whether the policy mix in a great crisis or a big event is a simple accumulation of short-term temporary decisions or a series of long-term careful considerations could even lead the great crisis or the big event in completely different directions under government intervention. The UK-EU Membership Referendum in Jun-2016 which has officially kicked off the Brexit process and been considered as one of the biggest events in the world economy and politics makes the above theoretical and practical themes on policy mix return to the forefront amid concerns. This study first builds two diagram frameworks on the basis of improved Mundell Assignment Rule and modified Swan Model to help define the theoretical optimal policy path as the comparison standard for empirically assessing various types of policy mix in the Brexit process, subsequently the searching of the unique theoretical optimal policy path with the least distance from the actual evolution path driven by policy mix is converted into a classical primal-dual optimization problem, which can be solved through the collaboration of the GRG (abbreviation for generalized reduced gradient) nonlinear algorithm and the evolutionary algorithm. The assessment results can be generally described as only “expenditure-changing policies minus external balance related components of monetary policies” and “mix of expenditure-changing policies and expenditure-switching policies” during the Brexit process are assessed to be more like a series of long-term careful considerations, while fiscal policies, monetary policies, expenditure-changing policies (as mix of fiscal policies and monetary policies), expenditure-switching policies plus external balance related components of monetary policies, internal balance related overall policy mix, external balance related overall policy mix, and overall policy mix during the Brexit process could only be evaluated to be more like a simple accumulation of short-term temporary decisions. However, these assessment results are sensitive to specific rules set by specific scenarios, assessment results under either the scenario “limited-size backward step allowed” or the scenario “backward step allowed but punished” are significantly better than those under the above original scenario “only step in the target direction allowed”, while assessment results under the scenario “different target directions for different periods” are only slightly better than those under the above original scenario.
英国脱欧过程中的政策组合是短期临时决策的简单积累,还是一系列长期审慎考虑:宏观经济政策评估的新框架
以往的研究和政策制定者的言论表明,无论是大危机或大事件中的政策组合是短期临时决策的简单积累,还是一系列长期的慎重考虑,甚至可能在政府干预下导致大危机或大事件走向完全不同的方向。2016年6月的英国脱欧公投正式开启了英国脱欧进程,被认为是世界经济和政治领域最大的事件之一,这使得上述关于政策组合的理论和实践主题在担忧中重新回到了最前沿。本研究首先在改进的蒙代尔分配规则和修正的Swan模型的基础上构建了两个图表框架,帮助定义理论最优政策路径作为实证评估英国脱欧过程中各种类型政策组合的比较标准,然后将寻找与政策组合驱动的实际演化路径距离最小的唯一理论最优政策路径转化为经典的原始对偶优化问题。可通过GRG(广义约简梯度)非线性算法和进化算法的协同求解。评估结果大致可以描述为英国脱欧过程中“改变支出的政策减去与外部平衡相关的货币政策成分”和“改变支出的政策和转换支出的政策组合”更像是一系列长期的仔细考虑,而财政政策、货币政策、改变支出的政策(作为财政政策和货币政策的组合)、支出转换政策加上与外部平衡相关的货币政策组成部分,与内部平衡相关的总体政策组合,与外部平衡相关的总体政策组合,以及英国脱欧过程中的总体政策组合,只能被评估为更像是短期临时决策的简单积累。但是,这些评价结果对具体情景设定的具体规则比较敏感,“允许后退有规模限制”和“允许后退但受到惩罚”两种情景下的评价结果明显优于“只允许向目标方向后退”两种情景下的评价结果。而“不同时期不同目标方向”情景下的评估结果仅略好于上述原始情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信