Studio as a Hub not a Home

Paul Skaggs
{"title":"Studio as a Hub not a Home","authors":"Paul Skaggs","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The studio method of instruction, termed “the classroom of the future,” is receiving a great deal of attention in the academic media. MIT’s new engineering building, for instance, will have numerous studio-instruction classrooms. The National Science Foundation is also promoting studio instruction in engineering and the sciences. Industrial Design has been using the studio method of instruction for more than 40 years it is even mandated by our accrediting body National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD). Because of this long history Industrial Design was asked to give a presentation about studio instruction to the Engineering faculty at BYU. The presentation focused on the principles of the studio class and where it works well and where it may not. What faculty and students’ responsibilities for a successful studio instruction? The interest and conversation that was generated from the presentation caused members of the Industrial Design faculty to reflect on our own history of studio instruction. Industrial design realized that the way we look at the studio experience has changed. Many of the principles that form the core of studio instruction have evolved as the design industry, design methods, students, and technologies have changed. As design educators we have experienced and struggled with these natural changes and how they have impacted studio classes and design students. As a result, we began to look at our methods to determine what the tradition from the arts and crafts past was and what is truly needed in design education today. Industrial Design had discovered that over time we had moved away from the student nesting workspace mentality of the traditional arts and crafts–based studio and toward the more current business model of the studio as a war room. The studio had moved away from a home to a hub for the students. This change has mirrored what is happening in the design industry as it has moved from focusing on tactical problem-solving skills to more strategic problem-finding and problem-defining skills. This paper outlines the history, basic principles, and focus of studio instruction and what has prompted the moving way from studio tradition.","PeriodicalId":158693,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The studio method of instruction, termed “the classroom of the future,” is receiving a great deal of attention in the academic media. MIT’s new engineering building, for instance, will have numerous studio-instruction classrooms. The National Science Foundation is also promoting studio instruction in engineering and the sciences. Industrial Design has been using the studio method of instruction for more than 40 years it is even mandated by our accrediting body National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD). Because of this long history Industrial Design was asked to give a presentation about studio instruction to the Engineering faculty at BYU. The presentation focused on the principles of the studio class and where it works well and where it may not. What faculty and students’ responsibilities for a successful studio instruction? The interest and conversation that was generated from the presentation caused members of the Industrial Design faculty to reflect on our own history of studio instruction. Industrial design realized that the way we look at the studio experience has changed. Many of the principles that form the core of studio instruction have evolved as the design industry, design methods, students, and technologies have changed. As design educators we have experienced and struggled with these natural changes and how they have impacted studio classes and design students. As a result, we began to look at our methods to determine what the tradition from the arts and crafts past was and what is truly needed in design education today. Industrial Design had discovered that over time we had moved away from the student nesting workspace mentality of the traditional arts and crafts–based studio and toward the more current business model of the studio as a war room. The studio had moved away from a home to a hub for the students. This change has mirrored what is happening in the design industry as it has moved from focusing on tactical problem-solving skills to more strategic problem-finding and problem-defining skills. This paper outlines the history, basic principles, and focus of studio instruction and what has prompted the moving way from studio tradition.
工作室是中心而不是家
被称为“未来课堂”的工作室教学方法正受到学术媒体的极大关注。例如,麻省理工学院的新工程大楼将有许多工作室教学教室。美国国家科学基金会也在推动工程和科学领域的工作室教学。工业设计已经使用了40多年的工作室教学方法,甚至被我们的认证机构国家艺术与设计学院协会(NASAD)授权。由于这个悠久的历史,工业设计被要求给杨百翰大学的工程学院做一个关于工作室教学的报告。演讲的重点是工作室课的原则,以及它在哪些方面有效,哪些方面可能不有效。教师和学生对成功的工作室教学有什么责任?演讲产生的兴趣和对话引起了工业设计学院成员对我们自己的工作室教学历史的反思。工业设计意识到我们看待工作室体验的方式已经改变。随着设计行业、设计方法、学生和技术的变化,构成工作室教学核心的许多原则也在不断发展。作为设计教育工作者,我们经历过这些自然变化,并与之斗争,以及它们如何影响工作室课程和设计专业的学生。因此,我们开始审视我们的方法,以确定过去的艺术和工艺传统是什么,以及今天的设计教育真正需要什么。工业设计发现,随着时间的推移,我们已经从传统的艺术和工艺工作室的学生嵌套工作空间的心态,转向了工作室作为作战室的更现代的商业模式。工作室已经从家庭搬到了学生的中心。这种变化反映了设计行业正在发生的事情,因为它已经从关注战术问题解决技能转向更多的战略问题发现和问题定义技能。本文概述了工作室教学的历史、基本原则和重点,以及促使工作室传统转变的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信