Resistance and Correlation of Pod Shattering and Selected Agronomic Traits in Soybeans

Richard Katembo Kataliko, P. Kimani, J. Muthomi, Wothaya S. Wanderi, F. Olubayo, F. Nzuve
{"title":"Resistance and Correlation of Pod Shattering and Selected Agronomic Traits in Soybeans","authors":"Richard Katembo Kataliko, P. Kimani, J. Muthomi, Wothaya S. Wanderi, F. Olubayo, F. Nzuve","doi":"10.5539/JPS.V8N2P39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pod shattering is a serious production constraint that causes 34 to 99% seed losses in soybean. Identification, development and utilization of varieties with resistance to pod shattering can reduce yield losses. However, there is limited information on genetic variability of this trait in local germplasm. Twenty soybean genotypes were evaluated at KALRO-Embu and KALRO-Mwea Research Centers, in Eastern and Central highlands of Kenya during the 2016 short and long rain seasons in an alpha lattice design arranged in a 4 x 5 pattern with three replicates. Data was collected on maturity, plant height, biomass, number of seeds per pod, pod shattering and grain yield and analyzed using Genstat software (15th edition). Pearson’s correlation estimates for pod shattering and agronomic traits was done using Statistix-8 statistical package. Results showed significant interactions between genotypes, sites and seasons for days to maturity, plant biomass and pod shattering. Seasonal and location effects were significant for all the traits measured except for plant height, grain yield and pod shattering. Genotype effects showed significances for all the traits. Results showed 17.87% of soybean pod shattering in Embu and 17.41% in Mwea; 16.58% during the long rains and 18.77% during the short rains. Based on their scores, ten genotypes were classified as resistant, seven as moderately resistant, one as moderately susceptible and two as highly susceptible. Genotypes SB-8 followed by Gazelle, SB-74, SB-4, Nyala and SB-20 were the most resistant. SB-93 and SB-25 were the most susceptible genotypes. Three varieties (931/5/34, 915/5/12 and SB-154) performed well with grain yields of up to 1800 kg ha-1. The study found that pod shattering resistance was negatively correlated with number of seeds per pod (r=-0.13*). Plant with few seeds per pod tended to have high resistance to pod shattering. The resistant genotypes can be utilized for production and in effective breeding programs.","PeriodicalId":410634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/JPS.V8N2P39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Pod shattering is a serious production constraint that causes 34 to 99% seed losses in soybean. Identification, development and utilization of varieties with resistance to pod shattering can reduce yield losses. However, there is limited information on genetic variability of this trait in local germplasm. Twenty soybean genotypes were evaluated at KALRO-Embu and KALRO-Mwea Research Centers, in Eastern and Central highlands of Kenya during the 2016 short and long rain seasons in an alpha lattice design arranged in a 4 x 5 pattern with three replicates. Data was collected on maturity, plant height, biomass, number of seeds per pod, pod shattering and grain yield and analyzed using Genstat software (15th edition). Pearson’s correlation estimates for pod shattering and agronomic traits was done using Statistix-8 statistical package. Results showed significant interactions between genotypes, sites and seasons for days to maturity, plant biomass and pod shattering. Seasonal and location effects were significant for all the traits measured except for plant height, grain yield and pod shattering. Genotype effects showed significances for all the traits. Results showed 17.87% of soybean pod shattering in Embu and 17.41% in Mwea; 16.58% during the long rains and 18.77% during the short rains. Based on their scores, ten genotypes were classified as resistant, seven as moderately resistant, one as moderately susceptible and two as highly susceptible. Genotypes SB-8 followed by Gazelle, SB-74, SB-4, Nyala and SB-20 were the most resistant. SB-93 and SB-25 were the most susceptible genotypes. Three varieties (931/5/34, 915/5/12 and SB-154) performed well with grain yields of up to 1800 kg ha-1. The study found that pod shattering resistance was negatively correlated with number of seeds per pod (r=-0.13*). Plant with few seeds per pod tended to have high resistance to pod shattering. The resistant genotypes can be utilized for production and in effective breeding programs.
大豆抗落荚性及其与选择农艺性状的相关性
豆荚破碎是严重的生产制约因素,造成大豆34 ~ 99%的种子损失。鉴定、开发和利用抗落荚品种可以减少产量损失。然而,关于该性状在本地种质中的遗传变异信息有限。在2016年短雨季和长雨季期间,在肯尼亚东部和中部高地的KALRO-Embu和KALRO-Mwea研究中心,采用3个重复的4 × 5 α格子设计,对20种大豆基因型进行了评估。收集成熟度、株高、生物量、每荚种子数、落荚率和籽粒产量等数据,利用Genstat软件(第15版)进行分析。利用统计软件包statistics -8对落荚率与农艺性状进行Pearson相关估计。结果表明,基因型、地点和季节与植株成熟期、生物量和落荚率之间存在显著的交互作用。除株高、籽粒产量和落荚率外,其他性状均受季节和地点影响显著。所有性状的基因型效应均显著。结果表明:Embu地区大豆落荚率为17.87%,Mwea地区为17.41%;长雨期16.58%,短雨期18.77%。根据它们的得分,10种基因型被分类为耐药型,7种为中等耐药型,1种为中等易感型,2种为高度易感型。基因型SB-8其次是Gazelle,其次是SB-74、SB-4、Nyala和SB-20。SB-93和SB-25是最敏感的基因型。3个品种(931/5/34、915/5/12和SB-154)表现良好,籽粒产量高达1800公斤每公顷。研究发现,抗落荚性与每荚种子数呈负相关(r=-0.13*)。每荚种子数少的植株对荚果碎裂的抗性较高。抗性基因型可用于生产和有效的育种计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信