Psychotropic Medication Use and Mortality in Long-Term Care Residents

M. Stones, Sarah Worobetz, Jason M Randle, Carlina Marchese, Shauna Fossum, Dane Ostrom, P. Brink
{"title":"Psychotropic Medication Use and Mortality in Long-Term Care Residents","authors":"M. Stones, Sarah Worobetz, Jason M Randle, Carlina Marchese, Shauna Fossum, Dane Ostrom, P. Brink","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines associations between psychotropic medications and mortality in long-term care home (LTCH) settings. We report new findings with census-level data from all new admissions to long-term care homes in the province of Ontario, Canada (i.e., 20,414 new residents). The data include three linked sets that indicate mortality during the financial years 2010–2011 and 2011–2012. One dataset, the Resident Assessment Instrument 2.0 (RAI 2.0), provides information on demographics, functional capability, clinical conditions, clinical diagnoses, mortality risk, and psychotropic medications. The latter include antipsychotics, antidepressants, analgesics, anxiolytics, and hypnotics. Administration of the RAI 2.0 occurs at resident intake, at quarterly intervals and annually. New analyses reported here examine predictors of daily and pro re nata (i.e., PRN or “as needed”) prescriptions of psychotropic medications. However, the most important analyses concern predictors of mortality within intervals of up to 90 days from the final RAI 2.0 assessment. After control for confounding variables, the findings indicate (1) attenuated mortality with daily prescription of frequently prescribed psychotropics (i.e., antipsychotics, antidepressants, and analgesics), (2) augmented mortality with PRN prescriptions for each type of psychotropic medication, and (3) evidence that PRN prescribing overturns beneficial effects of daily prescriptions, whereas the latter reduces the deleterious effects of PRN prescribing.","PeriodicalId":223575,"journal":{"name":"Aging - Life Span and Life Expectancy","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging - Life Span and Life Expectancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter examines associations between psychotropic medications and mortality in long-term care home (LTCH) settings. We report new findings with census-level data from all new admissions to long-term care homes in the province of Ontario, Canada (i.e., 20,414 new residents). The data include three linked sets that indicate mortality during the financial years 2010–2011 and 2011–2012. One dataset, the Resident Assessment Instrument 2.0 (RAI 2.0), provides information on demographics, functional capability, clinical conditions, clinical diagnoses, mortality risk, and psychotropic medications. The latter include antipsychotics, antidepressants, analgesics, anxiolytics, and hypnotics. Administration of the RAI 2.0 occurs at resident intake, at quarterly intervals and annually. New analyses reported here examine predictors of daily and pro re nata (i.e., PRN or “as needed”) prescriptions of psychotropic medications. However, the most important analyses concern predictors of mortality within intervals of up to 90 days from the final RAI 2.0 assessment. After control for confounding variables, the findings indicate (1) attenuated mortality with daily prescription of frequently prescribed psychotropics (i.e., antipsychotics, antidepressants, and analgesics), (2) augmented mortality with PRN prescriptions for each type of psychotropic medication, and (3) evidence that PRN prescribing overturns beneficial effects of daily prescriptions, whereas the latter reduces the deleterious effects of PRN prescribing.
长期护理居民的精神药物使用和死亡率
本章探讨精神药物与长期护理院(LTCH)环境中死亡率之间的关系。我们报告了加拿大安大略省所有新入院的长期护理院(即20,414名新居民)的普查数据的新发现。这些数据包括三组相互关联的数据,显示了2010-2011财政年度和2011-2012财政年度的死亡率。其中一个数据集,居民评估工具2.0 (RAI 2.0),提供了人口统计、功能能力、临床状况、临床诊断、死亡风险和精神药物方面的信息。后者包括抗精神病药、抗抑郁药、镇痛药、抗焦虑药和催眠药。RAI 2.0在居民入学时、每季度和每年进行一次。本文报道的新分析检查了每日和临时(即PRN或“按需”)精神药物处方的预测因素。然而,最重要的分析涉及从最终RAI 2.0评估开始最长90天内的死亡率预测因子。在控制混杂变量后,研究结果表明:(1)每日服用常用精神药物(即抗精神病药、抗抑郁药和镇痛药)降低了死亡率,(2)每种精神药物的PRN处方增加了死亡率,(3)有证据表明,PRN处方推翻了每日处方的有益作用,而后者减少了PRN处方的有害作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信