{"title":"Very Old and the Very Modern Clothing of Anarchism. Theory","authors":"Yury Voronov","doi":"10.17212/2075-0862-2023-15.1.1-105-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the main stages in the development of the theory of anarchism. The author started his examination of anarchist ideas from Errico Malatesta’s book “The System of Anarchism in Ten Conversations for the Peasants”. Then, the author considers the works of a French politician, philosopher and economist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. The paper touches upon the problem of practical implementation of his theoretical principles up to the present time. The author also takes into account the works of the geographical school of anarchism (Elise’e Reclus and Peter Kropotkin). The paper analyses the anarchist origins of the classical school of political economy. It is noted that a significant part of Adam Smith’s ideas was previously expressed by his predecessor, anarchist William Godwin. In particular, it is shown that the category of ‘invisible hand’ originated from anarchist ideas about the inner world of a person, and not from the ideas that ‘the market will decide everything’. Some aspects of the history of the First International, the role of anarchists in the creation and activities of the First International are considered. The article describes the emergence and development of anarchism in Japan, it is shown that the Japanese branch of anarchism is closely connected with the works of M. Bakunin. The problem of long-term propaganda of the ideas of anarchism in US universities is touched upon. The main authors of anarchist works are singled out from among them. The author also considers Christian theological anarchism associated with the name of I. Illich, as well as the works of the followers and propagandists of anarcho-Islam that have appeared in recent years. According to the author, the ideas of anarchism are poorly analyzed by historians, which leads to many incorrect assessments of current events and erroneous predictions of the future, especially in recent decades. The reason for this is ignoring the role of anarchist thought in the socio-economic life of the world. It is noted that the penetration of anarchist ideas into social theories and political doctrines of very different directions takes place in such a way that they become an inseparable part of them and are no longer considered anarchist. Briefly, the main idea of the article can be expressed in the words: “Theoretical anarchism does matter”.","PeriodicalId":336825,"journal":{"name":"Ideas and Ideals","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas and Ideals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2023-15.1.1-105-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article discusses the main stages in the development of the theory of anarchism. The author started his examination of anarchist ideas from Errico Malatesta’s book “The System of Anarchism in Ten Conversations for the Peasants”. Then, the author considers the works of a French politician, philosopher and economist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. The paper touches upon the problem of practical implementation of his theoretical principles up to the present time. The author also takes into account the works of the geographical school of anarchism (Elise’e Reclus and Peter Kropotkin). The paper analyses the anarchist origins of the classical school of political economy. It is noted that a significant part of Adam Smith’s ideas was previously expressed by his predecessor, anarchist William Godwin. In particular, it is shown that the category of ‘invisible hand’ originated from anarchist ideas about the inner world of a person, and not from the ideas that ‘the market will decide everything’. Some aspects of the history of the First International, the role of anarchists in the creation and activities of the First International are considered. The article describes the emergence and development of anarchism in Japan, it is shown that the Japanese branch of anarchism is closely connected with the works of M. Bakunin. The problem of long-term propaganda of the ideas of anarchism in US universities is touched upon. The main authors of anarchist works are singled out from among them. The author also considers Christian theological anarchism associated with the name of I. Illich, as well as the works of the followers and propagandists of anarcho-Islam that have appeared in recent years. According to the author, the ideas of anarchism are poorly analyzed by historians, which leads to many incorrect assessments of current events and erroneous predictions of the future, especially in recent decades. The reason for this is ignoring the role of anarchist thought in the socio-economic life of the world. It is noted that the penetration of anarchist ideas into social theories and political doctrines of very different directions takes place in such a way that they become an inseparable part of them and are no longer considered anarchist. Briefly, the main idea of the article can be expressed in the words: “Theoretical anarchism does matter”.
本文论述了无政府主义理论发展的主要阶段。作者对无政府主义思想的考察始于埃里科·马拉泰斯塔(Errico Malatesta)的著作《给农民的十次谈话中的无政府主义体系》。然后,作者考虑了法国政治家、哲学家和经济学家皮埃尔-约瑟夫·蒲鲁东的作品。本文涉及到他的理论原则到目前为止的实际实施问题。作者还考虑到无政府主义地理学派(Elise 'e Reclus和Peter Kropotkin)的作品。本文分析了古典政治经济学派的无政府主义根源。值得注意的是,亚当·斯密的思想中有很大一部分是由他的前任,无政府主义者威廉·戈德温所表达的。特别是,它表明“看不见的手”的范畴起源于无政府主义关于一个人的内心世界的想法,而不是来自“市场将决定一切”的想法。第一国际历史的某些方面,无政府主义者在第一国际的创建和活动中的作用被考虑。本文叙述了无政府主义在日本的产生和发展,表明日本无政府主义分支与巴枯宁的作品有着密切的联系。探讨了美国大学长期宣传无政府主义思想的问题。无政府主义作品的主要作者是从他们当中挑选出来的。作者还考虑了与伊里奇的名字有关的基督教神学无政府主义,以及近年来出现的无政府伊斯兰教的追随者和宣传者的作品。根据作者的观点,历史学家对无政府主义的思想分析得很差,这导致了许多对当前事件的错误评估和对未来的错误预测,尤其是在最近几十年。其原因是忽视了无政府主义思想在世界社会经济生活中的作用。值得注意的是,无政府主义思想渗透到不同方向的社会理论和政治理论中,以这样一种方式发生,以至于它们成为它们不可分割的一部分,不再被视为无政府主义。简单地说,这篇文章的主要思想可以用“理论上的无政府主义很重要”来表达。