Non-dyadic human–robot interactions and online brand communities

Vitor M. Lima, M. Zanini, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray
{"title":"Non-dyadic human–robot interactions and online brand communities","authors":"Vitor M. Lima, M. Zanini, Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray","doi":"10.1108/mip-02-2022-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research investigates and conceptualizes non-dyadic human–robot interactions (HRI).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a netnographic study of the Facebook group called “iRobot – Roomba,” an online brand community dedicated to Roomba vacuums. Their data analysis employed an abductive approach, which extended the grounded theory method.FindingsDyadic portrayals of human–robot interactions can be expanded to consider other actants that are relevant to the consumption experiences of consumer robots. Not only humans but also nonhumans, such as an online brand community, have a meaningful role to play in shaping interactions between humans and robots.Research limitations/implicationsThe present study moves theoretical discussions on HRI from the individual level grounded in a purely psychological approach to a more collective and sociocultural approach.Practical implicationsIf managers do not have a proper assessment of human–robot interactions that considers different actants and their role in the socio-technical arrangement, they will find it more challenging to design and suggest new consumption experiences.Originality/valueUnlike most previous marketing and consumer research on human–robot interactions, we show that different actants exert agency in different ways, at different times and with different socio-technical arrangements.","PeriodicalId":402197,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-02-2022-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis research investigates and conceptualizes non-dyadic human–robot interactions (HRI).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a netnographic study of the Facebook group called “iRobot – Roomba,” an online brand community dedicated to Roomba vacuums. Their data analysis employed an abductive approach, which extended the grounded theory method.FindingsDyadic portrayals of human–robot interactions can be expanded to consider other actants that are relevant to the consumption experiences of consumer robots. Not only humans but also nonhumans, such as an online brand community, have a meaningful role to play in shaping interactions between humans and robots.Research limitations/implicationsThe present study moves theoretical discussions on HRI from the individual level grounded in a purely psychological approach to a more collective and sociocultural approach.Practical implicationsIf managers do not have a proper assessment of human–robot interactions that considers different actants and their role in the socio-technical arrangement, they will find it more challenging to design and suggest new consumption experiences.Originality/valueUnlike most previous marketing and consumer research on human–robot interactions, we show that different actants exert agency in different ways, at different times and with different socio-technical arrangements.
非二元人机交互和在线品牌社区
目的研究非二元人机交互(HRI),并对其进行概念化。设计/方法/方法作者对Facebook上名为“iRobot - Roomba”的小组进行了网络研究,这是一个致力于Roomba吸尘器的在线品牌社区。他们的数据分析采用了溯因法,扩展了扎根理论方法。研究结果人机交互的二元描述可以扩展到考虑与消费机器人的消费体验相关的其他行为。不仅是人类,也包括非人类,比如在线品牌社区,在塑造人类与机器人之间的互动方面可以发挥有意义的作用。研究局限/启示本研究将基于纯心理学方法的个人层面的人力资源调查理论讨论转向了更集体和社会文化的方法。如果管理者没有适当的评估人机交互,考虑到不同的行为者和他们在社会技术安排中的作用,他们会发现设计和建议新的消费体验更具挑战性。原创性/价值与之前大多数关于人机交互的营销和消费者研究不同,我们表明不同的行为者在不同的时间和不同的社会技术安排下以不同的方式施加代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信