Features of statistical analysis of quantitative data obtained from fellow eyes, nonparametric tests

Y. Pashentsev
{"title":"Features of statistical analysis of quantitative data obtained from fellow eyes, nonparametric tests","authors":"Y. Pashentsev","doi":"10.25276/0235-4160-2022-3-68-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To compare various approaches to statistical analysis of fellow eyes and to describe correct analysis using nonparametric tests with R software. Material and methods. Various approaches to statistical analysis of fellow eyes are analyzed. Three general strategies are stated: 1) inclusion of both eyes in the same group using standard methods of statistical analysis; 2) inclusion in the same group only one eye of each subject using standard statistical methods; 3) inclusion of the both eyes in the same group using advanced statistical methods accounting correlation between fellow eyes. Results. The first approach leads to a significant underestimation of p-values when comparing groups and increases the risk of rejecting the correct null hypothesis. The second approach does not allow taking into account all available data and decreases the statistical power of a study. The third approach uses all available data and allows making valid inferences. Conclusion. Unreasonable use of standard statistical approaches for analyses quantitative data of fellow eyes leads to a significant distortion of p-values, does not allow taking into account all the material. Best practices for such situations are advanced statistical techniques accounting correlations between fellow eyes, such as the RGL and DS methods of package clusrank for R language. Key words: clustered data, fellow eyes, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, R software environment, clusrank package","PeriodicalId":424200,"journal":{"name":"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2022-3-68-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To compare various approaches to statistical analysis of fellow eyes and to describe correct analysis using nonparametric tests with R software. Material and methods. Various approaches to statistical analysis of fellow eyes are analyzed. Three general strategies are stated: 1) inclusion of both eyes in the same group using standard methods of statistical analysis; 2) inclusion in the same group only one eye of each subject using standard statistical methods; 3) inclusion of the both eyes in the same group using advanced statistical methods accounting correlation between fellow eyes. Results. The first approach leads to a significant underestimation of p-values when comparing groups and increases the risk of rejecting the correct null hypothesis. The second approach does not allow taking into account all available data and decreases the statistical power of a study. The third approach uses all available data and allows making valid inferences. Conclusion. Unreasonable use of standard statistical approaches for analyses quantitative data of fellow eyes leads to a significant distortion of p-values, does not allow taking into account all the material. Best practices for such situations are advanced statistical techniques accounting correlations between fellow eyes, such as the RGL and DS methods of package clusrank for R language. Key words: clustered data, fellow eyes, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, R software environment, clusrank package
统计分析的特点是从同伴眼获得的定量数据,非参数检验
目的。比较不同的方法来统计分析同伴的眼睛和描述正确的分析使用非参数测试与R软件。材料和方法。各种方法的统计分析同伴眼睛进行了分析。提出了三种一般策略:1)使用标准的统计分析方法将两只眼睛纳入同一组;2)采用标准统计方法将每名受试者的一只眼纳入同一组;3)采用先进的统计方法将两只眼睛纳入同一组,计算两只眼睛之间的相关性。结果。第一种方法导致在比较组时显著低估p值,并增加拒绝正确原假设的风险。第二种方法不允许考虑所有可用的数据,降低了研究的统计能力。第三种方法使用所有可用的数据,并允许做出有效的推断。结论。不合理地使用标准统计方法来分析同伴眼睛的定量数据会导致p值的显著扭曲,不能考虑到所有的材料。这种情况的最佳实践是计算同伴之间相关性的高级统计技术,例如R语言的包集群的RGL和DS方法。关键词:聚类数据,同伴眼,Mann-Whitney U检验,Wilcoxon检验,R软件环境,clusterrank包
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信