Are index measures better than individual measures in assessing the association between environmental and financial performance? A multivariate analysis study

I. Elshahat, M. Freedman, A. Elshahat
{"title":"Are index measures better than individual measures in assessing the association between environmental and financial performance? A multivariate analysis study","authors":"I. Elshahat, M. Freedman, A. Elshahat","doi":"10.1504/ijca.2015.069935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we investigate the association between firms' environmental and financial performance. Using KLD's measures of environmental performance 13 of their variables were subject to factor analysis. Factor analysis is used to investigate how variables would cluster together into factors (based on the joint variations between variables) and then we investigated the association between this constructed factor and the firms' annual return. The factor analysis yielded three factors, non-chemical concern variables, strength variables and chemical concerns variable. Results point out that only the chemical concern factor is significantly associated with the firms' annual return. The results indicate that individual variables combined into an index measure may not necessarily improve or strengthen the association. Insignificant variables may dilute the significance of other variables leading to an insignificant index measure, or maybe positively (negatively) correlated variables may dominate the direction of association in a particular factor by outweighing negatively (positively) correlated variable respectively, However it highlights the true variables/factors that would better represent the construct addressed in the association.","PeriodicalId":343538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Accounting","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijca.2015.069935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the association between firms' environmental and financial performance. Using KLD's measures of environmental performance 13 of their variables were subject to factor analysis. Factor analysis is used to investigate how variables would cluster together into factors (based on the joint variations between variables) and then we investigated the association between this constructed factor and the firms' annual return. The factor analysis yielded three factors, non-chemical concern variables, strength variables and chemical concerns variable. Results point out that only the chemical concern factor is significantly associated with the firms' annual return. The results indicate that individual variables combined into an index measure may not necessarily improve or strengthen the association. Insignificant variables may dilute the significance of other variables leading to an insignificant index measure, or maybe positively (negatively) correlated variables may dominate the direction of association in a particular factor by outweighing negatively (positively) correlated variable respectively, However it highlights the true variables/factors that would better represent the construct addressed in the association.
在评估环境与财务绩效之间的关系时,指数衡量是否比个别衡量更好?多变量分析研究
在本研究中,我们探讨了企业环境绩效与财务绩效之间的关系。使用KLD的环境绩效衡量标准,他们的13个变量受到因素分析的影响。因子分析用于研究变量如何聚集在一起成为因素(基于变量之间的联合变化),然后我们调查了这个构建的因素与公司年收益之间的关联。因子分析得到三个因素,非化学关注变量,强度变量和化学关注变量。结果表明,只有化学品关注因素与企业年收益显著相关。结果表明,单独的变量组合成一个指标措施可能不一定改善或加强关联。不显著的变量可能会稀释其他变量的显著性,导致不显著的指标测量,或者可能正(负)相关的变量可能会通过分别超过负(正)相关的变量来主导特定因素的关联方向,但是它突出了真正的变量/因素,这些变量/因素更能代表关联中所处理的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信