Evaluation For Elastic Modulus Of CAD-CAM Milled And 3D Printed Denture Base Resins

Ahmed Zeidan, Ramy Abd El-Rahim, Mohamed R. Helal
{"title":"Evaluation For Elastic Modulus Of CAD-CAM Milled And 3D Printed Denture Base Resins","authors":"Ahmed Zeidan, Ramy Abd El-Rahim, Mohamed R. Helal","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.81731.1209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the elastic modulus between milled, 3D printed and conventional compression moulded denture base resins (DBRs). Materials and methods: Three different types of DBRs were used: milled resin (pre-polymerized PMMA plates) ; a 3D printed resin (photopolymerized resin); and a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat cured resin (powder-liquid system). Thirty specimens have been constructed with specific dimensions (65mm x10mm x3mm) and divided into 3 groups (10 for each group) according to the type of DBR, Group I contained the milled DBR specimens, Group II contained 3-dimentional printed DBR specimens, and Group III contained conventional compression moulded DBR specimens. The elastic modulus of the 30 specimens were measured and calculated by universal testing machine using three-point loading test. Results: The elastic modulus of the milled group was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups (P<0.05), while the elastic modulus of the compression moulded group was significantly greater than that of the 3D printed group (P<0.05). Conclusion: milled DBR show the highest elastic modulus when compared with conventional compression moulded or 3D printed DBRs, while 3D printed DBR shows the lowest elastic modulus.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.81731.1209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the elastic modulus between milled, 3D printed and conventional compression moulded denture base resins (DBRs). Materials and methods: Three different types of DBRs were used: milled resin (pre-polymerized PMMA plates) ; a 3D printed resin (photopolymerized resin); and a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat cured resin (powder-liquid system). Thirty specimens have been constructed with specific dimensions (65mm x10mm x3mm) and divided into 3 groups (10 for each group) according to the type of DBR, Group I contained the milled DBR specimens, Group II contained 3-dimentional printed DBR specimens, and Group III contained conventional compression moulded DBR specimens. The elastic modulus of the 30 specimens were measured and calculated by universal testing machine using three-point loading test. Results: The elastic modulus of the milled group was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups (P<0.05), while the elastic modulus of the compression moulded group was significantly greater than that of the 3D printed group (P<0.05). Conclusion: milled DBR show the highest elastic modulus when compared with conventional compression moulded or 3D printed DBRs, while 3D printed DBR shows the lowest elastic modulus.
CAD-CAM铣削和3D打印义齿基托树脂弹性模量的评价
目的:本研究的目的是比较研磨、3D打印和传统压缩成型义齿基托树脂(DBRs)的弹性模量。材料和方法:采用三种不同类型的dbr:研磨树脂(预聚合PMMA板);3D打印树脂(光聚合树脂);以及聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)热固化树脂(粉末-液体体系)。按照特定尺寸(65mm x10mm x3mm)制作标本30个,根据DBR类型分为3组(每组10个),第一组为铣削DBR标本,第二组为三维打印DBR标本,第三组为常规压缩成型DBR标本。采用万能试验机进行三点加载试验,对30个试件的弹性模量进行了测量和计算。结果:磨模组弹性模量显著高于其他2组(P<0.05),压模组弹性模量显著大于3D打印组(P<0.05)。结论:铣削DBR的弹性模量高于常规压模和3D打印DBR,而3D打印DBR的弹性模量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信