Offer and use of virtual and face-to-face mentoring: perceptions of nursing tutors and students / Oferta y uso de tutorías virtuales y presenciales: percepciones de profesores y estudiantes de enfermería

M. Guerra-Martín, M. Lima-Serrano, J. Lima-Rodríguez
{"title":"Offer and use of virtual and face-to-face mentoring: perceptions of nursing tutors and students / Oferta y uso de tutorías virtuales y presenciales: percepciones de profesores y estudiantes de enfermería","authors":"M. Guerra-Martín, M. Lima-Serrano, J. Lima-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2017.1382047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aims of this study are to compare the perceptions of tutors and students of nursing at the University of Seville (Spain) on the offer, use and time distribution of face-to-face and virtual mentoring, to analyse the influence of socio-demographic variables on this, and to find out which tools tutors use for virtual mentoring. A descriptive correlational study with 181 professors and 1,015 students is carried out, in which a previously validated questionnaire is applied; the analysis is supported with SPSS 18.0. The majority of tutors affirm that face-to-face mentoring is used the most. The tool used the most in virtual mentoring is email. It is observed that the characteristics of the mentoring are influenced by the tutor’s teaching experience and dedication, their academic background and qualifications and the educational centre where it takes place. Virtual mentoring is presented as a strategy that allows students greater access to and use of mentoring. However, not only the use of e-mail should be promoted, but also the use of other communication tools at the same time, such as chats and video calls, since students require speedy attention that is also fluid and personalized.","PeriodicalId":153832,"journal":{"name":"Cultura y Educación","volume":"360 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura y Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2017.1382047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The aims of this study are to compare the perceptions of tutors and students of nursing at the University of Seville (Spain) on the offer, use and time distribution of face-to-face and virtual mentoring, to analyse the influence of socio-demographic variables on this, and to find out which tools tutors use for virtual mentoring. A descriptive correlational study with 181 professors and 1,015 students is carried out, in which a previously validated questionnaire is applied; the analysis is supported with SPSS 18.0. The majority of tutors affirm that face-to-face mentoring is used the most. The tool used the most in virtual mentoring is email. It is observed that the characteristics of the mentoring are influenced by the tutor’s teaching experience and dedication, their academic background and qualifications and the educational centre where it takes place. Virtual mentoring is presented as a strategy that allows students greater access to and use of mentoring. However, not only the use of e-mail should be promoted, but also the use of other communication tools at the same time, such as chats and video calls, since students require speedy attention that is also fluid and personalized.
虚拟和面对面辅导的提供和使用:护理导师和学生的看法/虚拟和面对面辅导的提供和使用:护理教师和学生的看法
摘要:本研究的目的是比较塞维利亚大学(西班牙)护理专业的导师和学生对面对面和虚拟辅导的提供、使用和时间分布的看法,分析社会人口变量对此的影响,并找出导师使用哪些工具进行虚拟辅导。对181名教授和1015名学生进行了描述性相关研究,其中使用了先前有效的问卷;分析支持SPSS 18.0。大多数导师确认面对面的指导是使用最多的。在虚拟指导中使用最多的工具是电子邮件。可以观察到,辅导的特点受导师的教学经验和奉献精神、他们的学术背景和资格以及发生辅导的教育中心的影响。虚拟指导是一种允许学生更多地访问和使用指导的策略。然而,不仅应该提倡使用电子邮件,同时也应该提倡使用其他通信工具,如聊天和视频电话,因为学生需要快速的注意力,这也是流动的和个性化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信