Single MLP-CFAR for a radar Doppler processor based on the ML criterion. Validation on real data

N. del-Rey-Maestre, D. Mata-Moya, P. Jarabo-Amores, P. Gomez-del-Hoyo, J. Martin-de-Nicolas
{"title":"Single MLP-CFAR for a radar Doppler processor based on the ML criterion. Validation on real data","authors":"N. del-Rey-Maestre, D. Mata-Moya, P. Jarabo-Amores, P. Gomez-del-Hoyo, J. Martin-de-Nicolas","doi":"10.1109/EURAD.2015.7346235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tackles the evaluation of radar detectors with real data in a scenario composed by targets with unknown Doppler shift and sea clutter. A Neural Network-based Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) technique, NN-CFAR, is compared with reference detection schemes based on Doppler processors and conventional CFAR detectors. In these reference solutions, although CFAR techniques are designed for a desired false alarm rate, PFA, we prove that the final PFA rate is higher than the desired one. In this paper, a detection performance improvement is obtained with a detector that is a better approximation to the Neyman-Pearson detector based on the generalized Likelihood Ratio (selecting the maximum filter bank output), and uses a unique CFAR detector. Due to the non-linear nature of the maximum function, conventional CFAR detectors are not suitable. The improved detector is designed and applied to real data acquired by a coherent and pulsed radar system at X-band frequencies. Results prove that the NN-CFAR provides a higher probability of detection while fulfilling the PFA requirement.","PeriodicalId":376019,"journal":{"name":"2015 European Radar Conference (EuRAD)","volume":"401 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 European Radar Conference (EuRAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EURAD.2015.7346235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper tackles the evaluation of radar detectors with real data in a scenario composed by targets with unknown Doppler shift and sea clutter. A Neural Network-based Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) technique, NN-CFAR, is compared with reference detection schemes based on Doppler processors and conventional CFAR detectors. In these reference solutions, although CFAR techniques are designed for a desired false alarm rate, PFA, we prove that the final PFA rate is higher than the desired one. In this paper, a detection performance improvement is obtained with a detector that is a better approximation to the Neyman-Pearson detector based on the generalized Likelihood Ratio (selecting the maximum filter bank output), and uses a unique CFAR detector. Due to the non-linear nature of the maximum function, conventional CFAR detectors are not suitable. The improved detector is designed and applied to real data acquired by a coherent and pulsed radar system at X-band frequencies. Results prove that the NN-CFAR provides a higher probability of detection while fulfilling the PFA requirement.
基于ML准则的雷达多普勒处理器的单MLP-CFAR。真实数据验证
本文研究了在未知多普勒频移和海杂波目标组成的情况下,用真实数据对雷达探测器进行评估的问题。将基于神经网络的恒虚警率检测技术(NN-CFAR)与基于多普勒处理器的参考检测方案和传统的恒虚警率检测器进行了比较。在这些参考方案中,尽管CFAR技术是为期望的虚警率PFA而设计的,但我们证明最终的PFA率高于期望的PFA率。本文采用了一种基于广义似然比(选择最大滤波器组输出)的更接近Neyman-Pearson检测器的检测器,并使用了唯一的CFAR检测器,从而提高了检测性能。由于最大函数的非线性性质,传统的CFAR检测器不适合。设计了改进后的探测器,并将其应用于x波段相干脉冲雷达系统的实际数据采集中。结果表明,在满足PFA要求的同时,NN-CFAR具有较高的检测概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信