Optimizing Bottom Hole Assembly Design Criteria to Improve Mechanical Performance in Slim Hole Drilling Environment

Stephen Fleming, Roberto Ucero, Yu.A. Poltavchenko
{"title":"Optimizing Bottom Hole Assembly Design Criteria to Improve Mechanical Performance in Slim Hole Drilling Environment","authors":"Stephen Fleming, Roberto Ucero, Yu.A. Poltavchenko","doi":"10.2118/208541-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After analyzing the historical data of neighboring wells adjacent to the drilling site, 11 bit trips were required due to the low mechanical performance of the bottom hole assembly elements. This observation is based on maximum circulation hours and low helical bucking values that make it uneconomic to drill the sections with a positive displacement motor drive system. A redesign the bottom hole assembly was proposed to achieve an improved mechanical performance which allowed the section to be drilled with a single assembly.\n With a focus on increasing the mechanical limitations of the downhole elements, the use of 4 ¾\" equipment is considered instead of the 3 ½\" standard equipment used in this hole size. One of the biggest challenges was modifying the 4 ¾\" positive displacement motor (PDM) to fit into the 5 ½\" hole given that the mud motor has a maximum unmodified diameter of 5 ½\".\n Using the force analysis module of a State-of-the-art BHA modelling software suite, multiple iterations were performed to simulate and validate an alternative PDM design and accompanying directional assembly. This new design featured modifications to an existing 4 ¾\" PDM deploying a long gauge bit in combination with a fit for purpose measurement while drilling system.\n After numerous runs using this assembly design, it was found that there was no additional or unexpected wear of the modified Mud Motor components or associated elements of the downhole equipment. These observations act to validate the pre-job engineering force analysis.\n With the improved mechanical specifications of the 4 ¾\" Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) components, circulating hours were increased from 100 hours to 250+ hours in a stepwise process. This enabled drilling of the entire 5 ½\" section with a single BHA, comparing favorably to the legacy approach with an average of eleven bit runs.\n The modified 4 ¾\" PDM coupled with long gauge bit technology enabled a reduction in the oriented to rotate drilling ratio and an associated increase in the overall rate of penetration (ROP).\n It can be concluded that the substitution of 4 ¾\" drilling equipment for 3 ½\" in the 5 ½\" hole section, increased the drilling efficiency between 30-50% according to field data obtained in Ukraine.\n The modified 4 ¾\" PDM combined with long gauge bit technology has the potential to improve 5 ½\" hole drilling performance in other locations. Following a structured planning process using State-of-the-art BHA modelling software suite enabling the evaluation of the significant forces that act in the drilling assembly and so significantly reducing the risks associated with exceeding the original design limits of the assembly. By improving the mechanical performance of the drilling assembly in a 5 ½\" hole, new territory for drilling engineers and design engineers is now available to increase the drilling performance in slim wellbores.","PeriodicalId":259631,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, November 23, 2021","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, November 23, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208541-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After analyzing the historical data of neighboring wells adjacent to the drilling site, 11 bit trips were required due to the low mechanical performance of the bottom hole assembly elements. This observation is based on maximum circulation hours and low helical bucking values that make it uneconomic to drill the sections with a positive displacement motor drive system. A redesign the bottom hole assembly was proposed to achieve an improved mechanical performance which allowed the section to be drilled with a single assembly. With a focus on increasing the mechanical limitations of the downhole elements, the use of 4 ¾" equipment is considered instead of the 3 ½" standard equipment used in this hole size. One of the biggest challenges was modifying the 4 ¾" positive displacement motor (PDM) to fit into the 5 ½" hole given that the mud motor has a maximum unmodified diameter of 5 ½". Using the force analysis module of a State-of-the-art BHA modelling software suite, multiple iterations were performed to simulate and validate an alternative PDM design and accompanying directional assembly. This new design featured modifications to an existing 4 ¾" PDM deploying a long gauge bit in combination with a fit for purpose measurement while drilling system. After numerous runs using this assembly design, it was found that there was no additional or unexpected wear of the modified Mud Motor components or associated elements of the downhole equipment. These observations act to validate the pre-job engineering force analysis. With the improved mechanical specifications of the 4 ¾" Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) components, circulating hours were increased from 100 hours to 250+ hours in a stepwise process. This enabled drilling of the entire 5 ½" section with a single BHA, comparing favorably to the legacy approach with an average of eleven bit runs. The modified 4 ¾" PDM coupled with long gauge bit technology enabled a reduction in the oriented to rotate drilling ratio and an associated increase in the overall rate of penetration (ROP). It can be concluded that the substitution of 4 ¾" drilling equipment for 3 ½" in the 5 ½" hole section, increased the drilling efficiency between 30-50% according to field data obtained in Ukraine. The modified 4 ¾" PDM combined with long gauge bit technology has the potential to improve 5 ½" hole drilling performance in other locations. Following a structured planning process using State-of-the-art BHA modelling software suite enabling the evaluation of the significant forces that act in the drilling assembly and so significantly reducing the risks associated with exceeding the original design limits of the assembly. By improving the mechanical performance of the drilling assembly in a 5 ½" hole, new territory for drilling engineers and design engineers is now available to increase the drilling performance in slim wellbores.
优化井底钻具组合设计标准,提高小井眼钻井环境下的机械性能
在分析了邻近钻井现场的相邻井的历史数据后,由于底部钻具组合元件的机械性能较低,需要起下钻11次。这一观察结果是基于最大循环时间和较低的螺旋屈曲值,这使得使用正排量电机驱动系统钻井是不经济的。设计人员对井底钻具组合进行了重新设计,以提高其机械性能,从而使该井段能够使用单个钻具组合进行钻井。为了增加井下元件的机械限制,考虑使用4 - 3 / 4”的设备,而不是在该井眼尺寸中使用的3 - 1 / 2”标准设备。最大的挑战之一是修改4 - 3 / 4”的正位移马达(PDM),以适应5 - 1 / 2”的井眼,因为泥浆马达的最大未修改直径为5 - 1 / 2”。利用最先进的BHA建模软件套件的受力分析模块,进行了多次迭代,以模拟和验证替代PDM设计和随附的定向装配。这种新设计的特点是对现有的4 - 3 / 4”PDM进行了改进,采用了长尺寸钻头和适合随钻测量的系统。经过多次使用这种组合设计的下入,发现改进后的泥浆马达组件或井下设备的相关元件没有额外或意外的磨损。这些观察结果验证了工作前的工程力分析。随着4 - 3 / 4”底部钻具组合(BHA)组件机械规格的提高,循环时间逐步从100小时增加到250小时以上。这使得只需一个BHA就可以钻进整个5 - 1 / 2”的井段,相比之下,传统的方法平均需要11趟钻。改进后的4 - 3 / 4”PDM与长径钻头技术相结合,降低了定向旋转钻井比,提高了整体钻速(ROP)。根据在乌克兰获得的现场数据,可以得出结论,在5½”井段,将3½”钻井设备替换为4¾”钻井设备,可将钻井效率提高30-50%。改进后的4 - 3 / 4”PDM与长径钻头技术相结合,有可能在其他位置改善5 - 1 / 2”井眼的钻井性能。使用最先进的BHA建模软件套件进行结构化的规划过程,能够评估钻井组合中的重要力量,从而显着降低与超过组合原始设计限制相关的风险。通过改善5.5英寸井眼钻井组合的机械性能,为钻井工程师和设计工程师提供了提高小井眼钻井性能的新领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信