Results and clinical consequences of trials on thoracic endografting

Ruth Benson, Benjamin O. Patterson, Ian M. Loftus
{"title":"Results and clinical consequences of trials on thoracic endografting","authors":"Ruth Benson,&nbsp;Benjamin O. Patterson,&nbsp;Ian M. Loftus","doi":"10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVR) has developed from endovascular treatment of infra-renal </span>aortic aneurysms<span>, and is now considered first line treatment for a variety of thoracic aortic pathologies. In contrast to infra-renal repair, with its large evidence base and randomised control trials, most of the existing data on TEVR is from smaller industry run trials designed to evaluate the safety of a particular device. The aim of this review is to describe these studies with respect to peri-operative adverse events, frequency of device failure, mid-term aortic death, mid-term overall survival and freedom from re-intervention. The results are discussed in the context of their implications for clinical practice, taking into account the relative strengths and weakness of the available data. Where the individual trial design allows, direct comparison is made between TEVR and open surgical controls. The role of TEVR for specific pathologies is also discussed.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101091,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021113000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVR) has developed from endovascular treatment of infra-renal aortic aneurysms, and is now considered first line treatment for a variety of thoracic aortic pathologies. In contrast to infra-renal repair, with its large evidence base and randomised control trials, most of the existing data on TEVR is from smaller industry run trials designed to evaluate the safety of a particular device. The aim of this review is to describe these studies with respect to peri-operative adverse events, frequency of device failure, mid-term aortic death, mid-term overall survival and freedom from re-intervention. The results are discussed in the context of their implications for clinical practice, taking into account the relative strengths and weakness of the available data. Where the individual trial design allows, direct comparison is made between TEVR and open surgical controls. The role of TEVR for specific pathologies is also discussed.

胸腔内植入术的临床效果
胸主动脉血管内修复(TEVR)是从肾下动脉瘤的血管内治疗发展而来的,现在被认为是各种胸主动脉病变的一线治疗方法。与肾下修复相比,TEVR有大量的证据基础和随机对照试验,大多数现有的TEVR数据来自规模较小的工业试验,旨在评估特定设备的安全性。本综述的目的是描述这些关于围手术期不良事件、器械失效频率、中期主动脉死亡、中期总生存率和再次干预自由度的研究。考虑到现有数据的相对优势和劣势,在其对临床实践的影响的背景下讨论结果。在个体试验设计允许的情况下,将TEVR与开放手术对照进行直接比较。还讨论了TEVR在特定病理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信