Keynote Speaker: Credible Simulation Models - Provenance beyond Reproducibility

A. Uhrmacher
{"title":"Keynote Speaker: Credible Simulation Models - Provenance beyond Reproducibility","authors":"A. Uhrmacher","doi":"10.1109/DISTRA.2018.8600928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When expressing concerns about the credibility of simulation studies, simulation data have been traditionally in the focus. However, what about another and, some might argue, even more central product of simulation studies, i.e., the simulation model itself? How can the credibility of a simulation model be assessed? Therefore, information about the process of generating a simulation model is needed. This provenance relates entities (or artifacts) and activities involved in the generating process. Based on simulation studies we will illuminate how the provenance of a simulation model relates the refinement, extension, composition, calibration and validation of simulation models to the diverse sources used in these processes. To exploit this information, unambiguously means for specifying entities play a central role. For example, a formal domain-specific language for modeling facilitates assessing and reusing simulation models. Similarly, a declarative domain-specific language for specifying simulation experiments, helps utilizing simulation experiments done with earlier models for future models. Thus, provenance, information about the past, does not only allow to understand the present, but also to design the future, in opening up new avenues for generating and analyzing simulation models.","PeriodicalId":196377,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DISTRA.2018.8600928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When expressing concerns about the credibility of simulation studies, simulation data have been traditionally in the focus. However, what about another and, some might argue, even more central product of simulation studies, i.e., the simulation model itself? How can the credibility of a simulation model be assessed? Therefore, information about the process of generating a simulation model is needed. This provenance relates entities (or artifacts) and activities involved in the generating process. Based on simulation studies we will illuminate how the provenance of a simulation model relates the refinement, extension, composition, calibration and validation of simulation models to the diverse sources used in these processes. To exploit this information, unambiguously means for specifying entities play a central role. For example, a formal domain-specific language for modeling facilitates assessing and reusing simulation models. Similarly, a declarative domain-specific language for specifying simulation experiments, helps utilizing simulation experiments done with earlier models for future models. Thus, provenance, information about the past, does not only allow to understand the present, but also to design the future, in opening up new avenues for generating and analyzing simulation models.
主讲人:可信的模拟模型——超越可重复性的起源
当对模拟研究的可信度表示担忧时,模拟数据一直是传统的焦点。然而,另一个,有些人可能会说,甚至是模拟研究的核心产品,即模拟模型本身呢?如何评估模拟模型的可信度?因此,需要关于生成仿真模型过程的信息。此来源将生成过程中涉及的实体(或工件)和活动联系起来。基于仿真研究,我们将阐明仿真模型的来源如何将仿真模型的细化、扩展、组成、校准和验证与这些过程中使用的不同来源联系起来。为了利用这些信息,用于指定实体的明确方法起着核心作用。例如,用于建模的正式领域特定语言有助于评估和重用仿真模型。类似地,用于指定模拟实验的声明性领域特定语言,有助于利用早期模型完成的模拟实验用于未来的模型。因此,来源,关于过去的信息,不仅可以让我们了解现在,还可以设计未来,为生成和分析模拟模型开辟新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信