Transnational knowledge in volunteering for development – A postcolonial approach to weltwärts

B. Haas, A. Repenning
{"title":"Transnational knowledge in volunteering for development – A postcolonial approach to weltwärts","authors":"B. Haas, A. Repenning","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2018.1427834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract International volunteering for development programs (V4D) are on the rise. Weltwärts is by far the largest program in Germany, with thousands of participants. These programs constitute transnational arenas of knowledge production, as their networks transcend nation-states boundaries and produce rules, ideas, and knowledge that travel through these networks. V4D programs claim to contribute to knowledge production. In this article, we examine how and where knowledge is created, shaped, and contested within the weltwärts program. To do so, we analyze documents, secondary data, two qualitative case studies, and informal interviews with stakeholders. We draw on postcolonial theory and the literature on transnational knowledge in order to analyze possibilities for transnational knowledge production, as well as its challenges and barriers. We argue that unequal power relations lead to structural underrepresentation of perspectives and knowledge of stakeholders from the global South, despite the good will of numerous stakeholders in the North. However, we also note that stakeholders in the South have started to claim such opportunities for participation and even organize their own spaces of knowledge production and networking. We conclude that developing transnational understandings of concepts like development, decision-making processes in transnational settings must critically reflect upon and overcome postcolonial power structures.","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1427834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract International volunteering for development programs (V4D) are on the rise. Weltwärts is by far the largest program in Germany, with thousands of participants. These programs constitute transnational arenas of knowledge production, as their networks transcend nation-states boundaries and produce rules, ideas, and knowledge that travel through these networks. V4D programs claim to contribute to knowledge production. In this article, we examine how and where knowledge is created, shaped, and contested within the weltwärts program. To do so, we analyze documents, secondary data, two qualitative case studies, and informal interviews with stakeholders. We draw on postcolonial theory and the literature on transnational knowledge in order to analyze possibilities for transnational knowledge production, as well as its challenges and barriers. We argue that unequal power relations lead to structural underrepresentation of perspectives and knowledge of stakeholders from the global South, despite the good will of numerous stakeholders in the North. However, we also note that stakeholders in the South have started to claim such opportunities for participation and even organize their own spaces of knowledge production and networking. We conclude that developing transnational understandings of concepts like development, decision-making processes in transnational settings must critically reflect upon and overcome postcolonial power structures.
发展志愿服务中的跨国知识- weltwärts的后殖民方法
国际发展项目志愿服务(V4D)正在兴起。Weltwärts是目前为止德国最大的项目,有成千上万的参与者。这些项目构成了知识生产的跨国领域,因为它们的网络超越了民族国家的边界,并产生了通过这些网络传播的规则、思想和知识。V4D程序声称有助于知识生产。在本文中,我们将研究在weltwärts程序中如何以及在何处创造、塑造和争论知识。为此,我们分析了文件、二手数据、两个定性案例研究以及与利益相关者的非正式访谈。我们利用后殖民理论和关于跨国知识的文献来分析跨国知识生产的可能性,以及它的挑战和障碍。我们认为,不平等的权力关系导致来自全球南方的利益相关者的观点和知识的结构性代表性不足,尽管北方的众多利益相关者有良好的意愿。然而,我们也注意到,南方的利益相关者已经开始要求这种参与机会,甚至组织他们自己的知识生产和网络空间。我们的结论是,发展对发展等概念的跨国理解,跨国环境中的决策过程必须批判性地反思和克服后殖民权力结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信