Seeing the wood for the trees: workplace learning evaluation

Richard Griffin
{"title":"Seeing the wood for the trees: workplace learning evaluation","authors":"Richard Griffin","doi":"10.1108/03090591111168357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journal of European Industrial Training V. 35 (8) 2011. Purpose – This paper seeks to argue that workplace learning evaluation theory and practice is still an emergent field and that this creates a number of challenges for practitioners and researchers alike.\nDesign/methodology/approach – This is a descriptive paper based on a critical review of existing approaches and the research literature.\nFindings – While programme evaluation has a long history, workplace learning evaluation is yet to establish itself as a distinct field. This has a number of consequences including the lack of a single or settled view on how workplace learning should be evaluated or what specific aspects of learning should be investigated.\nPractical implications – The need to demonstrate a return on investment in organisational learning is as pressing as ever. To become more effective training evaluation methods need to be grounded in a theory. This article aims to provide an informed perspective on the current state of workplace evaluation along with insights into how evaluation can be placed on firmer theoretical foundations in order to produce robust findings in a practitioner friendly way.\nOriginality/value – This paper provides original insights into the development of workplace evaluation approaches and the challenges the field faces.","PeriodicalId":181682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Industrial Training","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Industrial Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111168357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Journal of European Industrial Training V. 35 (8) 2011. Purpose – This paper seeks to argue that workplace learning evaluation theory and practice is still an emergent field and that this creates a number of challenges for practitioners and researchers alike. Design/methodology/approach – This is a descriptive paper based on a critical review of existing approaches and the research literature. Findings – While programme evaluation has a long history, workplace learning evaluation is yet to establish itself as a distinct field. This has a number of consequences including the lack of a single or settled view on how workplace learning should be evaluated or what specific aspects of learning should be investigated. Practical implications – The need to demonstrate a return on investment in organisational learning is as pressing as ever. To become more effective training evaluation methods need to be grounded in a theory. This article aims to provide an informed perspective on the current state of workplace evaluation along with insights into how evaluation can be placed on firmer theoretical foundations in order to produce robust findings in a practitioner friendly way. Originality/value – This paper provides original insights into the development of workplace evaluation approaches and the challenges the field faces.
只见树木不见树木:职场学习评价
欧洲工业培训学报,35(8)2011。目的-本文试图证明,工作场所学习评估理论和实践仍然是一个新兴领域,这给从业者和研究人员带来了许多挑战。设计/方法论/方法-这是一篇基于对现有方法和研究文献的批判性回顾的描述性论文。研究结果-虽然课程评估有着悠久的历史,但工作场所学习评估尚未成为一个独特的领域。这有许多后果,包括缺乏一个单一的或固定的观点,关于如何评估工作场所的学习或学习的具体方面应该进行调查。实际意义——证明对组织学习的投资回报的需求与以往一样紧迫。要使培训评估方法更加有效,就必须以理论为基础。本文旨在为工作场所评估的现状提供一个知情的视角,并深入了解如何将评估置于更坚实的理论基础上,以便以一种对从业者友好的方式产生强有力的发现。原创性/价值-本文对工作场所评估方法的发展和该领域面临的挑战提供了独到的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信