Analysis and Evaluation of Public Policy: Some Reflections

A. S. Kumar
{"title":"Analysis and Evaluation of Public Policy: Some Reflections","authors":"A. S. Kumar","doi":"10.1177/2455133316650543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engaging with senior policymakers can be an unsettling experience anywhere in the world. The more effective among them tend to be extremely well informed and knowledgeable. They understand people’s problems, they are aware of constraints faced by governments and they seem to know the solutions. They appear to have internalised what works, and what does not. An astute political instinct guides them smoothly through the maze of public decision-making. They are able to figure out when to act and when not to. They know that for public policy to be effective and efficient, goal setting should be guided by a long-term vision. They know that the impact is maximised when the focus is on well-defined outcomes, attention is paid to process, and experts and citizens outside the government are widely consulted. And yet, we find that many policy decisions fall short of yielding the best outcomes for people. There are several reasons why this happens. One, public policy has to do with statecraft. Central to statecraft are both policy analysis and political analysis. Public administrators typically find themselves operating in highly complex and fluid, if not volatile, environments. And this makes it extremely difficult for them to separate evidence from speculation, balance economics and emotion and reconcile policy and politics. Two, policymakers are often required to take decisions with very little reliable information, let alone evidence. To illustrate, take the case of violence against children which adversely affects the lives of millions of children across the world (see, for instance, UNICEF, 2014). Violence experienced or even witnessed by children adversely affects the formation of capabilities through both life-course consequences (which include poor educational outcomes, depression, trauma and other behavioural problems) as well as intergenerational impacts. However, the Know Violence in Childhood global learning initiative which is synthesising Article","PeriodicalId":243965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133316650543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Engaging with senior policymakers can be an unsettling experience anywhere in the world. The more effective among them tend to be extremely well informed and knowledgeable. They understand people’s problems, they are aware of constraints faced by governments and they seem to know the solutions. They appear to have internalised what works, and what does not. An astute political instinct guides them smoothly through the maze of public decision-making. They are able to figure out when to act and when not to. They know that for public policy to be effective and efficient, goal setting should be guided by a long-term vision. They know that the impact is maximised when the focus is on well-defined outcomes, attention is paid to process, and experts and citizens outside the government are widely consulted. And yet, we find that many policy decisions fall short of yielding the best outcomes for people. There are several reasons why this happens. One, public policy has to do with statecraft. Central to statecraft are both policy analysis and political analysis. Public administrators typically find themselves operating in highly complex and fluid, if not volatile, environments. And this makes it extremely difficult for them to separate evidence from speculation, balance economics and emotion and reconcile policy and politics. Two, policymakers are often required to take decisions with very little reliable information, let alone evidence. To illustrate, take the case of violence against children which adversely affects the lives of millions of children across the world (see, for instance, UNICEF, 2014). Violence experienced or even witnessed by children adversely affects the formation of capabilities through both life-course consequences (which include poor educational outcomes, depression, trauma and other behavioural problems) as well as intergenerational impacts. However, the Know Violence in Childhood global learning initiative which is synthesising Article
公共政策分析与评价:几点思考
在世界任何地方,与高层决策者接触都可能是一种令人不安的经历。他们中最有效的往往是消息灵通和知识渊博的人。他们了解人们的问题,他们意识到政府面临的限制,他们似乎知道解决方案。他们似乎已经内化了哪些有用,哪些没用。敏锐的政治本能引导他们顺利地通过公共决策的迷宫。他们能够知道什么时候该行动,什么时候不该行动。他们知道,为了使公共政策有效和高效,目标的设定应该以长期愿景为指导。他们知道,当关注明确的结果、关注过程、广泛咨询政府以外的专家和公民时,影响就会最大化。然而,我们发现许多政策决定并没有给人们带来最好的结果。发生这种情况有几个原因。第一,公共政策与治国方略有关。治国之道的核心是政策分析和政治分析。公共行政人员通常发现自己在高度复杂和多变的环境中工作,如果不是不稳定的话。这使得他们很难区分证据和猜测,平衡经济和情感,调和政策和政治。第二,政策制定者经常被要求在几乎没有可靠信息的情况下做出决定,更不用说证据了。为了说明这一点,以暴力侵害儿童为例,它对全世界数百万儿童的生活产生了不利影响(例如,见联合国儿童基金会,2014年)。儿童所经历或目睹的暴力会对其能力的形成产生不利影响,包括终生后果(包括不良教育成果、抑郁、创伤和其他行为问题)以及代际影响。然而,了解儿童暴力全球学习倡议正在综合文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信