Public calls for criminal offenses in post-Soviet countries (comparative analysis)

M. Rubashchenko
{"title":"Public calls for criminal offenses in post-Soviet countries (comparative analysis)","authors":"M. Rubashchenko","doi":"10.21564/2311-9640.2021.16.244454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a comparative analysis of the criminal legislation of post-Soviet countries in terms of criminalization of public calls to commit criminal offenses. The criminal codes of the following countries have been studied: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Armenia, Georgia, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. \nCommon features of criminalization of public appeals in the named post-Soviet countries are established. Their distinctive features in comparison with the Ukrainian variant of regulation are defined. The list of subsequent crimes in the studied codes is not the same, but there are those whose public appeals are typical of the criminal codes of the vast majority of countries, namely – to: a) aggressive war, b) terrorist crimes, c) encroachments on the constitutional order and territorial integrity, d) mass riots. \nUnlike many European countries, the criminal codes of post-Soviet countries do not provide for universal types of public appeals (ie appeals to crime in general). The maximum of universalization here is calls only for crimes of a certain kind, for example, calls for terrorist crimes or crimes against the state. That is, it is mostly a case-by-case approach to the criminalization of public appeals – responsibility is established for public appeals to certain actions. \nIn addition, the article draws attention to the following: a) the degree of punishment of public calls, that is, the penalties contained in sanctions (unqualified or «simple» public calls  are mostly punishable by up to 3 years in prison or up to 5 years), b) the differentiation of responsibilities (aggravating circumstances), c) system and placement of special types of public calls in the structure of special parts of criminal codes.","PeriodicalId":387320,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2021.16.244454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of the criminal legislation of post-Soviet countries in terms of criminalization of public calls to commit criminal offenses. The criminal codes of the following countries have been studied: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Armenia, Georgia, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Common features of criminalization of public appeals in the named post-Soviet countries are established. Their distinctive features in comparison with the Ukrainian variant of regulation are defined. The list of subsequent crimes in the studied codes is not the same, but there are those whose public appeals are typical of the criminal codes of the vast majority of countries, namely – to: a) aggressive war, b) terrorist crimes, c) encroachments on the constitutional order and territorial integrity, d) mass riots. Unlike many European countries, the criminal codes of post-Soviet countries do not provide for universal types of public appeals (ie appeals to crime in general). The maximum of universalization here is calls only for crimes of a certain kind, for example, calls for terrorist crimes or crimes against the state. That is, it is mostly a case-by-case approach to the criminalization of public appeals – responsibility is established for public appeals to certain actions. In addition, the article draws attention to the following: a) the degree of punishment of public calls, that is, the penalties contained in sanctions (unqualified or «simple» public calls  are mostly punishable by up to 3 years in prison or up to 5 years), b) the differentiation of responsibilities (aggravating circumstances), c) system and placement of special types of public calls in the structure of special parts of criminal codes.
后苏联国家对刑事犯罪的公众呼吁(比较分析)
本文对后苏联国家刑事立法中公众呼吁犯罪的刑事化问题进行了比较分析。研究了下列国家的刑法:阿塞拜疆、白俄罗斯、亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚、爱沙尼亚、哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、摩尔多瓦、俄罗斯联邦、塔吉克斯坦、土库曼斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦。确定了所列后苏联国家将公众申诉定为刑事犯罪的共同特征。定义了它们与乌克兰监管变体相比的独特特征。所研究的法典中随后的罪行清单并不相同,但有一些罪行的公开上诉是绝大多数国家刑法的典型,即:a)侵略战争,b)恐怖主义犯罪,c)侵犯宪法秩序和领土完整,d)大规模骚乱。与许多欧洲国家不同,后苏联国家的刑法没有规定普遍类型的公众上诉(即对一般犯罪的上诉)。这里最大限度的普遍化是只要求某种类型的犯罪,例如,要求恐怖主义犯罪或反对国家的犯罪。也就是说,它主要是一种逐案处理将公众上诉定为刑事犯罪的办法- -对某些行动的公众上诉规定了责任。此外,该条提请注意以下事项:a)公开电话的惩罚程度,即制裁中包含的惩罚(不合格或“简单”公开电话大多可判处3年或5年以下徒刑),b)责任的区分(加重情节),c)在刑法特殊部分的结构中对特殊类型的公开电话的系统和放置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信