Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation with and without Kinesiotherapy on Pain, Range of Motion and Quality of Life in Patients with Cervical Dystonia; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mehak Imtiaz, Asna Waseem, Maida Chaudhary, A. Sultan, Nouman Abid, Dua Shahzad
{"title":"Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation with and without Kinesiotherapy on Pain, Range of Motion and Quality of Life in Patients with Cervical Dystonia; A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Mehak Imtiaz, Asna Waseem, Maida Chaudhary, A. Sultan, Nouman Abid, Dua Shahzad","doi":"10.55735/hjprs.v3i2.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" \nMethods: This study was a Randomized Controlled Trial conducted at The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, University Institute of Physical Therapy, Lahore. n= 84 patients with Cervical Dystonia were recruited in this study using non- probability convenient sampling technique. Patients suffering with Cervical Dystonia who aged between 30 till 50 years were randomly assigned into two groups, 42 patients in each group. First Group A which was the control group which was treated with Functional Electrical Stimulation and routine physical therapy only while Group B was the Experimental group which was treated with Functional Electrical Stimulation also with kinesiotherapy and routine physical therapy. Both the groups were evaluated and assessed using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale, the Pain Numerating Scale, the 36- item short form health survey( SF-36), Neck Disability index and range of motion of neck flexion, neck extension and neck rotation was measured using universal goniometer.\nResults: Functional Electrical Stimulation combined with kinesiotherapy given to the experimental group showed more improvement in range of motion, quality of life , functional disability and the symptom of the pain also was reduced in the experimental group as compared to the control group. The mean values showed that there was a statistically significant difference in different variables between both the groups. When the scores( scores at baseline and at 16th week) for Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale for both the groups were compared it showed statistical difference between both the groups(p<0.05).\nConclusion: Despite the fact that cervical dystonia has central neurological etiology, this study concludes that multimodal kinesiotherapy program which included stretching and relaxation, active exercises in addition to Functional Electrical Stimulation and Routine Physical Therapy tempts to have beneficial effects on a patient suffering from Cervical Dystonia. It showed beneficial effects on pain, quality of life, functional disability and range of motion of patients with cervical dystonia.\nKey Words: Functional Electrical Stimulation, Kinesiotherapy, Cervical Dystonia, Pain, Rang of Motion, Quality of life\n \n \n ","PeriodicalId":351154,"journal":{"name":"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55735/hjprs.v3i2.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  Methods: This study was a Randomized Controlled Trial conducted at The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, University Institute of Physical Therapy, Lahore. n= 84 patients with Cervical Dystonia were recruited in this study using non- probability convenient sampling technique. Patients suffering with Cervical Dystonia who aged between 30 till 50 years were randomly assigned into two groups, 42 patients in each group. First Group A which was the control group which was treated with Functional Electrical Stimulation and routine physical therapy only while Group B was the Experimental group which was treated with Functional Electrical Stimulation also with kinesiotherapy and routine physical therapy. Both the groups were evaluated and assessed using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale, the Pain Numerating Scale, the 36- item short form health survey( SF-36), Neck Disability index and range of motion of neck flexion, neck extension and neck rotation was measured using universal goniometer. Results: Functional Electrical Stimulation combined with kinesiotherapy given to the experimental group showed more improvement in range of motion, quality of life , functional disability and the symptom of the pain also was reduced in the experimental group as compared to the control group. The mean values showed that there was a statistically significant difference in different variables between both the groups. When the scores( scores at baseline and at 16th week) for Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale for both the groups were compared it showed statistical difference between both the groups(p<0.05). Conclusion: Despite the fact that cervical dystonia has central neurological etiology, this study concludes that multimodal kinesiotherapy program which included stretching and relaxation, active exercises in addition to Functional Electrical Stimulation and Routine Physical Therapy tempts to have beneficial effects on a patient suffering from Cervical Dystonia. It showed beneficial effects on pain, quality of life, functional disability and range of motion of patients with cervical dystonia. Key Words: Functional Electrical Stimulation, Kinesiotherapy, Cervical Dystonia, Pain, Rang of Motion, Quality of life      
功能电刺激加或不加运动疗法对颈肌张力障碍患者疼痛、活动范围和生活质量的影响一项随机临床试验
方法:本研究是在拉合尔大学教学医院、拉合尔大学物理治疗研究所进行的随机对照试验。本研究采用非概率方便抽样技术,招募84例宫颈肌张力障碍患者。将年龄在30 ~ 50岁之间的宫颈肌张力障碍患者随机分为两组,每组42例。第一组A是对照组只接受功能性电刺激和常规物理治疗B组是实验组接受功能性电刺激同时接受运动疗法和常规物理治疗。采用多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表、疼痛计算量表、36项简短健康问卷(SF-36)对两组患者进行评价和评估,采用通用角计测量颈部屈伸、颈部旋转的活动范围和颈部残疾指数。结果:实验组经功能性电刺激联合运动疗法治疗后,患者的活动范围、生活质量、功能障碍、疼痛症状均较对照组有明显改善。平均值显示两组间各变量差异有统计学意义。比较两组患者多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评分(基线和第16周),两组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:尽管颈张力障碍具有中枢神经病因,但本研究得出结论,多模态运动疗法包括伸展和放松,除功能性电刺激和常规物理治疗外的积极运动,对患有颈张力障碍的患者有有益的影响。它对颈肌张力障碍患者的疼痛、生活质量、功能残疾和活动范围有有益的影响。关键词:功能性电刺激,运动疗法,颈肌张力障碍,疼痛,活动范围,生活质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信