Nature Connectedness and Discursive Spaces; Understanding Student Responses to Sustainability Education

D. Walwyn
{"title":"Nature Connectedness and Discursive Spaces; Understanding Student Responses to Sustainability Education","authors":"D. Walwyn","doi":"10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the significant impact of engineering on the environment, educational curricula for engineers should, as a minimum, include courses on sustainability transitions. The Deep Transitions (DT) framework, however, argues that transitions will only be achieved if education is accompanied by the reshaping of students' ideological assemblages, through which sustainability becomes normative. The DT perspective raises two fundamental questions for engineering educators; is the student/lecturer interface appropriate for attempting such changes and if it were to be suitable, how could its extent be articulated and assessed? In this study, the concept of nature connectedness, already described in the field of environmental psychology, is explored as a means of understanding directionality and transition. Students completed a class exercise relating to choices on energy technology, and then participated in a qualitative study to understand their responses. Although the students acknowledge that the classroom is a discursive space, in which new bodies of meaning can be created, the intervention had little impact on their extent of nature connectedness. Changing the latter remains a challenging, if impractical, task for engineering educators.","PeriodicalId":206250,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the significant impact of engineering on the environment, educational curricula for engineers should, as a minimum, include courses on sustainability transitions. The Deep Transitions (DT) framework, however, argues that transitions will only be achieved if education is accompanied by the reshaping of students' ideological assemblages, through which sustainability becomes normative. The DT perspective raises two fundamental questions for engineering educators; is the student/lecturer interface appropriate for attempting such changes and if it were to be suitable, how could its extent be articulated and assessed? In this study, the concept of nature connectedness, already described in the field of environmental psychology, is explored as a means of understanding directionality and transition. Students completed a class exercise relating to choices on energy technology, and then participated in a qualitative study to understand their responses. Although the students acknowledge that the classroom is a discursive space, in which new bodies of meaning can be created, the intervention had little impact on their extent of nature connectedness. Changing the latter remains a challenging, if impractical, task for engineering educators.
自然-连通性与话语空间了解学生对可持续发展教育的反应
考虑到工程对环境的重大影响,工程师的教育课程应至少包括可持续性过渡的课程。然而,深度转型(DT)框架认为,只有在教育伴随着学生意识形态组合的重塑的情况下,才能实现转型,通过这种方式,可持续性成为规范。DT视角为工程教育工作者提出了两个基本问题;学生/讲师的界面是否适合尝试这些变化,如果是合适的,如何阐述和评估其程度?在本研究中,自然连通性的概念,已经在环境心理学领域描述,作为理解方向性和过渡的一种手段进行了探索。学生们完成了一项关于能源技术选择的课堂练习,然后参加了一项定性研究,以了解他们的反应。尽管学生们承认课堂是一个话语空间,可以在其中创造新的意义体,但干预对他们的自然联系程度几乎没有影响。对于工程教育工作者来说,改变后者仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,即使不切实际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信