Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses toward the Use of Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice

F. Kamberi
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses toward the Use of Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice","authors":"F. Kamberi","doi":"10.18662/EEJMHB/14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is aimed at evaluating the knowledge, perceptions, difficulties, and advantages associated with the use of Nursing Diagnosis (ND) in clinical practice by nurses. A cross – sectional study was conducted in April 2017 at Vlore Regional Hospital, Albania and included 43 nurses. For the data collection, an anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used. The Likert 1-5 rating scale was used for scoring the answers, 1-not difficult/small advantage and 5-very difficult/big advantage. Values of p≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. 51.16% of participants were women, mean of age 32 years, SD±7.17. A statistical association was found between the use of ND and the practice setting, p=0.0394. Knowledge about ND is gained through work or during studies. The use of ND was requested at work (60.47%) and 53.49% of nurses refer not to use it. The perceived difficulties are higher in female nurses (2.5), while nurses who use ND reported that the difficulties are related to lack of time and an understandable language. The maximum average score (4.0) for the benefits of using in function of improving and promoting nursing care with clinical standards were higher in male nurses. Among ND cited by nurses gaps in knowledge and confusion with medical diagnosis were identified. Findings suggest that improving clinical nursing practice through increased continuing education of nursing staff and improving curricula for ND can influence the proper use of ND, with a significant impact on the quality of care provided.","PeriodicalId":156854,"journal":{"name":"Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics","volume":"492 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/EEJMHB/14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The study is aimed at evaluating the knowledge, perceptions, difficulties, and advantages associated with the use of Nursing Diagnosis (ND) in clinical practice by nurses. A cross – sectional study was conducted in April 2017 at Vlore Regional Hospital, Albania and included 43 nurses. For the data collection, an anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used. The Likert 1-5 rating scale was used for scoring the answers, 1-not difficult/small advantage and 5-very difficult/big advantage. Values of p≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. 51.16% of participants were women, mean of age 32 years, SD±7.17. A statistical association was found between the use of ND and the practice setting, p=0.0394. Knowledge about ND is gained through work or during studies. The use of ND was requested at work (60.47%) and 53.49% of nurses refer not to use it. The perceived difficulties are higher in female nurses (2.5), while nurses who use ND reported that the difficulties are related to lack of time and an understandable language. The maximum average score (4.0) for the benefits of using in function of improving and promoting nursing care with clinical standards were higher in male nurses. Among ND cited by nurses gaps in knowledge and confusion with medical diagnosis were identified. Findings suggest that improving clinical nursing practice through increased continuing education of nursing staff and improving curricula for ND can influence the proper use of ND, with a significant impact on the quality of care provided.
护士对临床应用护理诊断的知识和态度
本研究旨在评估护士在临床实践中使用护理诊断(ND)的知识、认知、困难和优势。2017年4月在阿尔巴尼亚Vlore地区医院进行了一项横断面研究,包括43名护士。数据收集采用匿名自我管理问卷。使用李克特1-5量表对答案进行评分,1-不难/小优势,5-非常困难/大优势。p≤0.05认为有统计学意义。51.16%的参与者为女性,平均年龄32岁,SD±7.17。ND的使用与实践环境之间存在统计学关联,p=0.0394。关于ND的知识是通过工作或学习获得的。60.47%的护士要求在工作中使用ND, 53.49%的护士表示不使用ND。女护士感知到的困难更高(2.5),而使用ND的护士报告说,困难与缺乏时间和可理解的语言有关。男性护士对临床标准护理功能的改善和促进效益的最高平均得分(4.0分)较高。在护士提及的ND中,存在知识差距和对医学诊断的混淆。研究结果表明,通过增加护理人员的继续教育和改进ND课程来改善临床护理实践可以影响ND的正确使用,并对所提供的护理质量产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信